Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Mike Bost

RepublicanMike Bost

U.S. Representative · Illinois

Illinois's 12th district

RepublicanFederal

U.S. Representative from Illinois

1 tracked promise, 1 rated

Illinois · Illinois's 12th district

Illinois's 12th district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →
63/100
Trust rating
Generally keeps promises
63
0 · Broken50 · Mixed100 · Kept
A transparent rescale of the Integrity Score (+25) to 0–100, aggregated from 1 rated promise. Never an opaque single score. Provisional — based on 1 rated promise they could act on; a settled rating needs at least 5.
How this is calculated →

How they won their seat

Mike Bost won the 2024 U.S. House election in Illinois (District 12) with 74.2% of the vote (272,754 votes).

74.2%
Win share
272,754
Votes for winner
367,629
Total cast
  • Mike Bost · Republican74.2%
  • Brian Roberts · Democrat25.8%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

Mike Bost's record shows a concentration on veterans' affairs, agriculture, and infrastructure. He has sponsored multiple bills related to veterans' healthcare and support, such as the 'Take Care of America’s Veterans Act' and the 'Veterans Appeals Efficiency Act of 2025', alongside significant involvement in agricultural issues through his committee memberships and sponsorship of related legislation. Focus areas (from the record): Veterans Affairs · Agriculture · Infrastructure · Mental Health · Transportation Alignment with declared positions: Consistent. Bost's declared position on immigration and border security is consistent with his voting record, as he voted in favor of H.R. 2, the Secure the Border Act. However, the majority of his sponsored bills focus on veterans and agriculture. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills that became law; There is no information on the impact of his committee work; The absence of statements limits understanding of his public communication and advocacy strategies. Confidence: high (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Mike Bost has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2016. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Mike Bost has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.

Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

2bills sponsored
2 awaiting status
01234Bills2016: 2 awaiting status22016

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 0 sponsored bills became law

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$3.2M
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5M2026: raised $3.2M2026: spent $3.2M20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $128K (4%)Large individual (itemized): $1.3M (43%)43%PAC / committee: $1.6M (52%)52%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$128K4%
  • Large individual (itemized)$1.3M43%
  • PAC / committee$1.6M52%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Integrity

Promises kept vs. worked against — weighted breakdown

+25 · based on 1 rated promise

  • Attempted 1

Teal segments are promises kept; amber and stone segments are promises worked against. The signed score weights each rated promise by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is shown separately from popularity, finance, disclosure, and stated positions. Methodology is open.

Integrity over time

In office since Jan 2019 · 1 rated promise

The line steps at each recorded assessment and holds between them; it ends on the current published score.

−100 worked against0+100 kept
Integrity Score by assessment date. Score ranges from −100 (worked against) to +100 (kept).
DateIntegrity Score
Jul 202625
Jan 202725 (current, held from last rating)

Promise status over time

How the tracked promise record has evolved.

1 tracked
  • Kept1
  • Against0
  • No opportunity0
  • In progress0
011Jul 2026

Replayed from this official’s sourced assessment history — the bands step only when an assessment is recorded or changed. Based on the most recent roll-call votes on file and the tracked promise assessments; never interpolated.

Topic coverage

1 promise across 1 topic

What this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.

  • Immigration & Border Security1 promise

Evidence & significance

Evidence quality

Strongest source cited per promise.

  • Primary (official record)1100%

Significance mix

How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).

10
20
30
41
50

Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.

Tracked promises

1 tracked promise

Attemptedhigh confidence

Secure the U.S. southern border, including building a wall along the southern border and enforcing the "Remain in Mexico" policy; Bost voted to pass H.R. 2, the Secure the Border Act.

Immigration & Border SecuritySpecific · measurable
SourcesU.S. House Clerk, Roll Call 209 (2023) - H.R. 2 Secure the Border Act, On Passage· archivedMike Bost for Congress (campaign website)· archivedCongress.gov / Library of Congress — H.R.2, Secure the Border Act of 2023 (official summary, fetched HTTP 200)· archivedU.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Clerk — Roll Call 209, 118th Congress (fetched HTTP 200)· archivedCongress.gov / Library of Congress — H.R.2 status tracker (fetched HTTP 200)· archived

Verified record

128 sponsored bills · finance on file

Facts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.

Campaign financeas of Mar 31, 2026

FEC 2026 cycle — raised $1,107,544, spent $753,405, cash on hand $0.

View the FEC filing ↗

Voting record

Total votes
655
Yea
509
Nay
135
Present
0
Not voting
11

Full voting record

655 votes
  • S32Yea
  • S307Yea
120 of 655
Page 1 / 33

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Positions on record

3 positions on record

The record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.

  • Immigration & Border SecurityStated position

    Secure the U.S. southern border, including building a wall along the southern border and enforcing the "Remain in Mexico" policy; Bost voted to pass H.R. 2, the Secure the Border Act.

    SourcesMike Bost for Congress (campaign website)· archivedU.S. House Clerk, Roll Call 209 (2023) - H.R. 2 Secure the Border Act, On Passage· archived
    View position & sources
  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote

    On record voting YEA in the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure on Perry Amendment No. 221 to H.R. 8870, an amendment providing that a recipient of assistance under title 23, United States Code, may not use automated license plate readers for any purpose other than tolling. The amendment was not agreed to, 20 yeas to 44 nays.

    SourcesCommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure, 119th Congress, Full Committee Record of Committee Votes 75 to 127 on H.R. 8870 (markup of May 21, 2026); Vote 104 on Perry Amendment No. 221, restricting automated license plate reader use by recipients of title 23 highway assistance. Not agreed to, 20 yeas to 44 nays.
    View position & sources
  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote

    On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.

    SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.
    View position & sources
Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Suggest a correction to this official's info

See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Office context & community edit history

Help complete the record on this official

What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Mike Bost more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →