This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Mike Kelly's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

RepublicanMike Kelly
U.S. Representative · Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania's 16th district
U.S. Representative from Pennsylvania
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Mike Kelly won the 2024 U.S. House election in Pennsylvania (District 16) with 63.7% of the vote (256,923 votes).
- Mike Kelly · Republican63.7%256,923
- Preston Nouri · Democrat36.3%146,709
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Mike Kelly's record includes legislative activity related to tax policy, health care, and specific social issues. He has sponsored multiple bills concerning tax exemptions for religious institutions (HR 9353), health care access (HR 3514), and support for working families through initiatives such as HRES 1156. His committee membership on the House Committee on Ways and Means, particularly in the Tax and Health subcommittees, includes work relevant to these areas. Focus areas (from the record): Tax Policy · Health Care · Social Issues · Charitable Contributions · Veterans Affairs Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against his legislative activities, making it impossible to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal any declared positions or promises that could provide context for his legislative focus; There is no information on the effectiveness of the bills he sponsored or their impact; The record does not indicate any potential motives or intentions behind his legislative actions. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Mike Kelly has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2025. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Mike Kelly has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$37K2%
- Large individual (itemized)$609K34%
- PAC / committee$1.1M64%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Ways and MeansOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Chair, House Committee on Ways and Means — TaxOn record since Jan 2025Chair
- Member, House Committee on Ways and Means — HealthOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
176 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $886,279, spent $739,862, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HRES 1426: Remembering the life of Corey Comperatore who passed away on Saturday, July 13, 2024. ↗Jul 13, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9353: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt qualified religious institutions from the excise tax on investment income. ↗Jun 18, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9173: Charitable Deductions for Digital Asset Donations Act ↗Jun 8, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9098: Congressional Records Protection Act ↗Jun 2, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8376: Concurrent Care for Comfort Act ↗Apr 20, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1156: Expressing support for tax policies that support working families. ↗Apr 9, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7959: IRS Whistleblower Program Improvement Act ↗Mar 17, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6446: To modify the procedures for investigating claims of evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders. ↗Dec 4, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 732: Expressing support for the designation of September 30, 2025, as "Rare Cancer Day" to highlight the challenges patients with rare cancers face and to raise awareness and support efforts to improve early diagnosis and treatment. ↗Sep 17, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5275: Diagnostic Accuracy in Sepsis Act of 2025 ↗Sep 10, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4566: Washington’s Trail—1753 National Historic Trail Feasibility Study Act of 2025 ↗Jul 21, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4547: To advance Thomas B. Hagen on the retired list of the Navy. ↗Jul 17, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 176 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 493
- Nay
- 151
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 11
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Yea
- HR1501Yea
- HJRES1Yea
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HRES1490Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Yea
- HCONRES89Nay
- HCONRES113Yea
- HR7008Yea
- HR7008Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
1 position on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.