This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Mike Levin's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratMike Levin
U.S. Representative · California
California's 49th district
U.S. Representative from California
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Mike Levin won the 2024 U.S. House election in California (District 49) with 52.2% of the vote (197,397 votes).
- Mike Levin · Democrat52.2%197,397
- Matt Gunderson · Republican47.8%180,950
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Mike Levin's record includes a variety of bills related to environmental protection, military and veteran affairs, and health-related issues. He has sponsored bills such as the Plastic Pellet Free Waters Act and the Military Dependents School Meal Eligibility Act. His voting record includes instances of voting differently from the majority of his party. Focus areas (from the record): Environmental Protection · Veterans Affairs · Health Care · Military Support · Renewable Energy Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against Levin's legislative activity. Therefore, it is not possible to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The motives behind Levin's legislative choices are not disclosed in the record; There is no information on the effectiveness of the bills he has sponsored; The absence of declared positions limits the understanding of his priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Mike Levin has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Activity in office
What Mike Levin has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$217K7%
- Large individual (itemized)$2.3M79%
- PAC / committee$391K13%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on AppropriationsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — Energy and Water Development and Related AgenciesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related AgenciesOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
117 sponsored billsFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9753: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain retirement plan distributions used to pay qualified fertility treatment expenses from the early withdrawal tax. ↗Jul 16, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7942: DEATH BETS Act ↗Mar 16, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7879: SUPER BUGS Act of 2026 ↗Mar 9, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7598: VALOR Act ↗Feb 17, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7543: Plastic Pellet Free Waters Act ↗Feb 12, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7398: Passports for Purple Hearts and Medals of Honor Act ↗Feb 5, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7259: Military Dependents School Meal Eligibility Act of 2026 ↗Jan 27, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7066: SHIELD Act ↗Jan 14, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7038: Protecting Taxpayers from Risky Investments in Venezuela Act ↗Jan 13, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6455: Health Insurance Premium Fairness Act of 2025 ↗Dec 4, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6097: Transition Improvement by Estimating Risk Act of 2025 ↗Nov 18, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5195: Advancing Toward Impact Aid Full Funding Act ↗Sep 8, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 117 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 294
- Nay
- 356
- Present
- 1
- Not voting
- 4
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
2 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record asserting that the government ordinarily must obtain a judicial warrant to compel cell phone location data, and urging the DHS Inspector General to open a second investigation into ICE and other DHS components purchasing Americans' location data from commercial data brokers without one.
SourcesBicameral letter to DHS Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari requesting a second investigation of warrantless purchases of Americans' cell phone location data by ICE and other DHS componentsView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.