This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Nanette Diaz Barragán's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratNanette Diaz Barragán
U.S. Representative · California
California's 44th district
U.S. Representative from California
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Nanette Diaz BarragáN won the 2024 U.S. House election in California (District 44) with 71.4% of the vote (164,765 votes).
- Nanette Diaz BarragáN · Democrat71.4%164,765
- Roger Groh · Republican28.6%66,087
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Nanette Diaz Barragán's record indicates a pattern of sponsored bills and committee memberships related to health, environmental justice, and community engagement. She has sponsored multiple bills addressing climate change, public health, and the rights of specific communities, such as the 'Climate Justice Grants Act' and the 'Protect our Public Health Workforce Act'. Additionally, her committee memberships in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce suggest a pattern of involvement in energy and health policy. Focus areas (from the record): Public Health · Environmental Justice · Community Engagement · Climate Change · Health Policy Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There is insufficient evidence to assess alignment with declared positions or tracked promises. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal her effectiveness in passing legislation; There is no information on her specific motivations or strategic priorities; The absence of declared positions limits understanding of her policy focus. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Nanette Diaz Barragán has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2021–2023 term. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Nanette Diaz Barragán has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$141K9%
- Large individual (itemized)$853K55%
- PAC / committee$557K36%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Energy and CommerceOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — EnvironmentOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — Communications and TechnologyOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — HealthOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
129 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $669,609, spent $1,064,461, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HRES 1402: Supporting the goals and ideals of Alzheimer's and Brain Awareness Month. ↗Jun 30, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9454: Next Generation Shipping Act ↗Jun 25, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9418: Access to Innovative Treatments Act of 2026 ↗Jun 24, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1150: Recognizing and honoring Cambodian veterans of the Khmer National Armed Forces for their sacrifices, their support of the Armed Forces of the United States, and their defense of freedom in Southeast Asia. ↗Apr 2, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1017: Recognizing the threat of air pollution and extreme heat to maternal and infant health, and expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that meaningful interventions must be rapidly and equitably developed and deployed to address the unique vulnerabilities of pregnancy in Latino communities. ↗Jan 22, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7151: Artificial Intelligence Public Awareness and Education Campaign Act ↗Jan 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7152: Yes in God's Backyard Act ↗Jan 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7057: Returning Home Act ↗Jan 14, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6957: Yes in God's Backyard Act ↗Jan 7, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6839: Vaccine Transportation Access Act ↗Dec 18, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6614: Chemical Disaster Prevention Act ↗Dec 11, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6615: Climate Justice Grants Act ↗Dec 11, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 266
- Nay
- 367
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 22
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Not voting
- S307Not voting
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
3 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record demanding that DHS and ICE account for their use of Palantir-developed data analytics together with Clearview AI facial recognition, PenLink, L3Harris stingray and Paragon Solutions phone surveillance, and objecting to a mass surveillance ecosystem that has swept in U.S. citizens observing or protesting immigration enforcement.
SourcesLetter from Reps. Dan Goldman and Nydia M. Velazquez, Sen. Ron Wyden and 30 colleagues to DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and ICE Acting Director Todd M. Lyons on Palantir-developed data surveillance contractsView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record asserting that the government ordinarily must obtain a judicial warrant to compel cell phone location data, and urging the DHS Inspector General to open a second investigation into ICE and other DHS components purchasing Americans' location data from commercial data brokers without one.
SourcesBicameral letter to DHS Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari requesting a second investigation of warrantless purchases of Americans' cell phone location data by ICE and other DHS componentsView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.