This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Nikema Williams's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratNikema Williams
U.S. Representative · Georgia
Georgia's 5th district
U.S. Representative from Georgia
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Nikema Williams won the 2024 U.S. House election in Georgia (District 5) with 85.7% of the vote (294,470 votes).
- Nikema Williams · Democrat85.7%294,470
- \"John \\"\"Bongo\\"\" Salvesen\" · Republican14.3%49,221
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Nikema Williams' record shows involvement in issues related to financial services, housing, and voting rights, as evidenced by her sponsorship of bills like the Home Internet Accessibility Act (HR 9493), the Whole-Home Repairs Act of 2025 (HR 5990), and the Youth Voting Rights Act (HR 4916). Additionally, her committee memberships on the House Committee on Financial Services are involved in housing and insurance matters. Focus areas (from the record): Financial Services · Housing · Voting Rights · Maternal Health · Reproductive Rights Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against her legislative activity, making it impossible to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The effectiveness of her sponsored bills, as none have become law; Her specific motives or intentions behind the legislation; Any unlogged work or advocacy outside of her official record. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Nikema Williams has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2025–2027 term. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Nikema Williams has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$26K4%
- Large individual (itemized)$154K26%
- PAC / committee$403K69%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Financial ServicesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Oversight and InvestigationsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Housing and InsuranceOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
157 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $478,108, spent $442,859, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HRES 1420: Honoring the 31st International President and CEO of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc., Danette Anthony Reed. ↗Jul 6, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9493: Home Internet Accessibility Act ↗Jun 25, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9380: Expanding Access to Credit through Consumer-Permissioned Data Act ↗Jun 18, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9309: PRIDE Act of 2026 ↗Jun 11, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8950: REPORTS Act ↗May 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8716: Blood Pressure MATTERS Act ↗May 7, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8717: Negating Neighborhood Noise Act of 2026 ↗May 7, 2026
- Sponsored HJRES 171: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Bulletin 2022-06: Unfair Returned Deposited Item Fee Assessment Practices". ↗Apr 30, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8459: WISE Act ↗Apr 22, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8361: Clean Slate through Rehabilitation Act ↗Apr 16, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8317: Tech to Save Moms Act ↗Apr 15, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1163: Supporting the recognition of a "Day of Remembrance and Commitment to Maternal Health Equity", honoring the life of Kira Johnson, and commending 4Kira4Moms for its unwavering dedication to improving maternal health in Atlanta, throughout Georgia, and across the United States, and for other purposes. ↗Apr 9, 2026
Showing the 12 most recent of 157 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 262
- Nay
- 370
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 23
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
1 position on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.