DemocratPete Aguilar
U.S. Representative · California
California's 33rd district
U.S. Representative from California
3 tracked promises, 1 rated
How they won their seat
Pete Aguilar won the 2024 U.S. House election in California (District 33) with 58.8% of the vote (137,197 votes).
- Pete Aguilar · Democrat58.8%137,197
- Tom Herman · Republican41.2%96,078
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Pete Aguilar's record shows a significant focus on committee-related activities, with a majority of his sponsored bills pertaining to the election of members to various standing committees of the House of Representatives. Additionally, he has sponsored legislation related to affordable housing and student rights, showing involvement in housing and education issues. Focus areas (from the record): Committee Elections · Affordable Housing · Education Rights Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. The record does not provide information on the effectiveness of the bills he sponsored or his overall impact in office. What this can't tell you: The record does not provide information on the effectiveness of the bills; The absence of declared positions limits the analysis of his legislative focus. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Pete Aguilar has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2023–2025 term. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Pete Aguilar has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$375K12%
- Large individual (itemized)$1.3M42%
- PAC / committee$1.4M46%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on AppropriationsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — DefenseOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related AgenciesOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Integrity
Promises kept vs. worked against — weighted breakdown+50 · based on 1 rated promise
- Partial 1
Teal segments are promises kept; amber and stone segments are promises worked against. The signed score weights each rated promise by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is shown separately from popularity, finance, disclosure, and stated positions. Methodology is open.
Integrity over time
In office since Jan 2019 · 1 rated promiseThe line steps at each recorded assessment and holds between them; it ends on the current published score.
| Date | Integrity Score |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | 50 |
| Jan 2027 | 50 (current, held from last rating) |
Promise status over time
How the tracked promise record has evolved.
- Kept1
- Against0
- No opportunity0
- In progress0
Replayed from this official’s sourced assessment history — the bands step only when an assessment is recorded or changed. Based on the most recent roll-call votes on file and the tracked promise assessments; never interpolated.
Topic coverage
3 promises across 3 topicsWhat this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.
- Federal Funding / Community Investment1
- Healthcare / Prescription Drug Costs1
- Housing1
Evidence & significance
Evidence quality
Strongest source cited per promise.
- Primary (official record)3100%
Significance mix
How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).
Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.
3 tracked promises
“Lower prescription drug costs for Inland Empire families and seniors by empowering Medicare to negotiate drug prices directly with manufacturers and capping out-of-pocket insulin costs at $35 per month.”
“Secure the nearly $49.7 million in federal Community Project Funding requested for 20 Inland Empire community projects (FY2027) covering job training, water/flood infrastructure, public safety, affordable housing, transportation, and healthcare.”
“Reintroduce and pass the Affordable Housing Resident Services Act (H.R. 4874) to establish a competitive HHS grant program funding resident services (health, education, and self-sufficiency programs) in federally assisted affordable housing.”
Verified record
85 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $4,194,305, spent $3,503,428, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HRES 1202: Electing a Member to a certain standing committee of the House of Representatives. ↗Apr 21, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1048: Electing a Member to a certain standing committee of the House of Representatives. ↗Feb 10, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 954: Electing a Member to a certain standing committee of the House of Representatives. ↗Dec 17, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 890: Expressing support for the designation of November 19, 2025, as "National GIS Day". ↗Nov 18, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 721: Electing Members to certain standing committees of the House of Representatives. ↗Sep 16, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4874: Affordable Housing Resident Services Act ↗Aug 5, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 538: Ranking a Certain Member on a certain standing committee of the House of Representatives. ↗Jun 24, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 430: Electing Members to certain standing committees of the House of Representatives. ↗May 20, 2025
- Sponsored HR 2402: No Hungry Kids in Schools Act ↗Mar 27, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 214: Electing Members to certain standing committees of the House of Representatives. ↗Mar 11, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 162: Electing Members to certain standing committees of the House of Representatives. ↗Feb 25, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 125: Electing Members to certain standing committees of the House of Representatives. ↗Feb 11, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 284
- Nay
- 366
- Present
- 1
- Not voting
- 4
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
4 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Healthcare / Prescription Drug CostsStated position
Lower prescription drug costs for Inland Empire families and seniors by empowering Medicare to negotiate drug prices directly with manufacturers and capping out-of-pocket insulin costs at $35 per month.
SourcesOffice of Rep. Pete Aguilar (aguilar.house.gov)· archivedInland Empire Community NewspapersOffice of Rep. Pete Aguilar (aguilar.house.gov)· archivedView position & sources → - Federal Funding / Community InvestmentStated position
Secure the nearly $49.7 million in federal Community Project Funding requested for 20 Inland Empire community projects (FY2027) covering job training, water/flood infrastructure, public safety, affordable housing, transportation, and healthcare.
SourcesOffice of Rep. Pete Aguilar (aguilar.house.gov)· archivedLegiStormView position & sources → - HousingStated position
Reintroduce and pass the Affordable Housing Resident Services Act (H.R. 4874) to establish a competitive HHS grant program funding resident services (health, education, and self-sufficiency programs) in federally assisted affordable housing.
SourcesOffice of Rep. Pete Aguilar (aguilar.house.gov)· archivedHope through Housing FoundationCongress.gov (Library of Congress)· archivedQuiver QuantitativeView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Office context & community edit history
Help complete the record on this official
What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Pete Aguilar more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.