This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Raja Krishnamoorthi's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratRaja Krishnamoorthi
U.S. Representative · Illinois
Illinois's 8th district
U.S. Representative from Illinois
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Raja Krishnamoorthi won the 2024 U.S. House election in Illinois (District 8) with 57.1% of the vote (172,920 votes).
- Raja Krishnamoorthi · Democrat57.1%172,920
- Mark Rice · Republican42.9%130,153
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Raja Krishnamoorthi's record indicates a pattern of sponsored bills related to health care, consumer protection, and immigration reform, as evidenced by bills such as the Medicare Expansion and Lowering Costs Now Act (HR 7909) and the High-skilled Immigration Reform for Employment Act (HR 6305). Additionally, his involvement in committees related to oversight and intelligence may relate to government accountability and national security issues. Focus areas (from the record): Health Care · Consumer Protection · Immigration Reform · Government Accountability · National Security Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against the inferred activity patterns from the sponsored bills and committee memberships. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal specific motives or intentions behind the sponsored bills; There is no information on the effectiveness of the proposed legislation; The absence of declared positions limits the ability to assess alignment with broader policy goals. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Raja Krishnamoorthi has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2024. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Raja Krishnamoorthi has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$216K6%
- Large individual (itemized)$2.8M78%
- PAC / committee$583K16%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Permanent Select Committee on IntelligenceOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist PartyOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Ranking Member, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform — Health Care and Financial ServicesOn record since Jan 2025Ranking
- Member, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence — Central Intelligence AgencyOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
160 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $3,915,985, spent $20,801,950, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9748: To provide consumer protections for students. ↗Jul 16, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9747: To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants for career support for a skilled, internationally educated health care workforce. ↗Jul 16, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9596: Federal Jobs for STARs Act of 2026 ↗Jul 6, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1322: Condemning racist rhetoric targeting Indian and Chinese Americans, reaffirming that immigrants from all backgrounds are vital to the United States, and calling on all elected officials to refrain from language that promotes racial or ethnic division. ↗May 22, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8932: Hate Crimes Commission Act of 2026 ↗May 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8577: Disaster Declaration Transparency Act of 2026 ↗Apr 29, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8429: Baby Food Safety Act of 2026 ↗Apr 22, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7909: Medicare Expansion and Lowering Costs Now Act ↗Mar 12, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7833: Puerto Rican People’s Power Restoration Act of 2026 ↗Mar 5, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7542: Kids Need Lunch Act ↗Feb 12, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7161: No Private Bounty Hunters for Immigration Enforcement Act ↗Jan 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7160: First Home Affordability Act ↗Jan 20, 2026
Showing the 12 most recent of 160 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 272
- Nay
- 369
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 14
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
5 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record asserting that the government ordinarily must obtain a judicial warrant to compel cell phone location data, and urging the DHS Inspector General to open a second investigation into ICE and other DHS components purchasing Americans' location data from commercial data brokers without one.
SourcesBicameral letter to DHS Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari requesting a second investigation of warrantless purchases of Americans' cell phone location data by ICE and other DHS componentsView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record objecting to ICE's acquisition of Penlink tools that collect and search cellphone location data across entire neighborhoods, and demanding that DHS identify any legal justification for mass electronic surveillance conducted without a judicial or administrative warrant.
SourcesLetter from Rep. Shontel M. Brown and 12 colleagues to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem on ICE's acquisition of Penlink neighborhood-scale cellphone location surveillanceView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record urging the FTC to investigate Flock Safety and hold it accountable for not requiring multi-factor authentication on law enforcement accounts, characterizing that failure as an unfair business practice prohibited by Section 5 of the FTC Act.
SourcesLetter from Sen. Ron Wyden and Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi to FTC Chair Andrew N. Ferguson requesting an investigation of Flock SafetyView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record objecting to the use of Flock's automatic license plate reader network to track people across state lines for abortion-related and immigration enforcement purposes, and demanding transparency and accountability over who accesses that data and how.
SourcesLetter from Reps. Robert Garcia and Raja Krishnamoorthi (Committee on Oversight and Government Reform) to Flock Group Inc. CEO Garrett Langley on license plate reader technology and trackingView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.