
RepublicanThomas Massie
U.S. Representative · Kentucky
Kentucky's 4th district
U.S. Representative from Kentucky
1 tracked promise
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Thomas Massie won the 2024 U.S. House election in Kentucky (District 4) with 99.6% of the vote (278,386 votes).
- Thomas Massie · Republican99.6%278,386
- 1 Other Candidate0.4%1,131
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Thomas Massie's record includes bills such as the 'Gold Reserve Transparency Act of 2025' and the 'No Capital Gains Tax on Family Farms Act', which address financial accountability and tax policy. His involvement in the House Committee on the Judiciary includes participation in legal and constitutional matters. Focus areas (from the record): government transparency · individual rights · fiscal policy · constitutional issues · agriculture Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. The lack of evidence does not support any claims about alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal any declared positions or promises to assess alignment; It does not indicate the effectiveness of the sponsored bills or his influence in committee work; The record lacks information on his public statements or specific motivations behind his legislative actions. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Thomas Massie has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2016. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$330K31%
- Large individual (itemized)$614K57%
- PAC / committee$135K13%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on the JudiciaryOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure — AviationOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure — Water Resources and EnvironmentOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure — Highways and TransitOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on the Judiciary — Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the InternetOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on the Judiciary — The Constitution and Limited GovernmentOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Integrity
Not yet ratedNo promises have been rated yet, so there is no Integrity Score to show. Lifecycle promises (in progress, not yet rated) are tracked but never scored.
The score, once promises are rated, is a signed −100…+100 breakdown weighted by significance and evidence confidence — never a single opaque grade. How this is measured.
Integrity over time
Topic coverage
1 promise across 1 topicWhat this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.
- Congressional ethics and transparency — sexual harassment settlements1 promise
Evidence & significance
Evidence quality
Strongest source cited per promise.
- Primary (official record)1100%
Significance mix
How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).
Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.
1 tracked promise
“Will produce greater public transparency about what happened during the first 20 years of the congressional workplace-claims settlement program.”
Verified record
96 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $5,541,900, spent $5,840,666, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HRES 1430: Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R.185) to advance responsible policies. ↗Jul 15, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9694: To amend the Epstein Files Transparency Act with respect to enforcement by an attorney general of a State, and for other purposes. ↗Jul 15, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1399: Directing the Committee on Ethics to preserve and publicly release records relating to .monetary settlements involving acts of sexual harassment. ↗Jun 30, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1406: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives honoring the men of the USS Liberty, urging the declassification of all records relating to the June 8, 1967, attack, and affirming that the lives and safety of United States citizens and servicemembers shall be paramount in the conduct of United States foreign policy. ↗Jun 30, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8809: AIPAC Act ↗May 14, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8591: No Capital Gains Tax on Family Farms Act ↗Apr 30, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8470: Surveillance Accountability Act ↗Apr 23, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7880: Interstate Milk Freedom Act of 2026 ↗Mar 9, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7601: No Immunity for Glyphosate Act ↗Feb 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6508: NATO Act ↗Dec 9, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5811: Restoring America’s Leadership in Innovation Act of 2025 ↗Oct 24, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5704: Repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2013 ↗Oct 8, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 401
- Nay
- 212
- Present
- 2
- Not voting
- 40
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Yea
- HJRES1Yea
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HRES1490Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HR6500Nay
- S32Nay
- S307Yea
- HR8884Yea
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR7008Nay
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
2 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Congressional ethics and transparency — sexual harassment settlementsStated position
Will produce greater public transparency about what happened during the first 20 years of the congressional workplace-claims settlement program.
SourcesCongressional Record, Volume 172, Number 109 (House), Pages H4345-H4346View position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Office context & community edit history
Help complete the record on this official
What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Thomas Massie more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.