This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Tom McClintock's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
RepublicanTom McClintock
U.S. Representative · California
California's 5th district
U.S. Representative from California
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Tom McClintock won the 2024 U.S. House election in California (District 5) with 61.8% of the vote (227,643 votes).
- Tom McClintock · Republican61.8%227,643
- \"Michael J. \\"\"Mike\\"\" Barkley\" · Democrat38.2%140,919
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Tom McClintock's record has sponsored multiple bills related to land management, immigration enforcement, and fiscal responsibility. He has sponsored multiple bills related to federal land jurisdiction, immigration policies, and budgetary amendments, such as HR 8454 and HR 2640. His committee memberships further emphasize these areas, particularly in natural resources and immigration. Focus areas (from the record): Land Management · Immigration Enforcement · Fiscal Responsibility · Natural Resources · Public Safety Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against McClintock's legislative activity. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Tom McClintock has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2021. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Tom McClintock has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$414K24%
- Large individual (itemized)$1.1M65%
- PAC / committee$200K11%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Natural ResourcesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on the JudiciaryOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on the BudgetOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Natural Resources — Water, Wildlife and FisheriesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Natural Resources — Federal LandsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Chair, House Committee on the Judiciary — Immigration Integrity, Security, and EnforcementOn record since Jan 2025Chair
- Member, House Committee on the Judiciary — The Constitution and Limited GovernmentOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
107 sponsored billsFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 8454: To provide for the transfer of administrative jurisdiction over certain Federal land in the State of California, and for other purposes. ↗Apr 22, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8380: To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to establish certain procedures for consideration of annual appropriation bills, and for other purposes. ↗Apr 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7640: Shut Down Sanctuary Policies Act of 2026 ↗Feb 23, 2026
- Sponsored HR 5437: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act ↗Sep 17, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4041: To exempt certain forest management activities in Yosemite National Park from requirements of section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and for other purposes. ↗Jun 17, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3940: Open America's Waters Act ↗Jun 12, 2025
- Sponsored HJRES 99: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide that new States may be admitted to the United States upon a concurrence of two thirds of each house of Congress. ↗Jun 6, 2025
- Sponsored HR 2566: End Taxpayer Subsidies for Electric Vehicles Act ↗Apr 1, 2025
- Sponsored HR 2302: Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians Land Transfer Act of 2025 ↗Mar 24, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 166: Expressing support for the Iranian people's desires for a democratic, secular, and nonnuclear Republic of Iran, and condemning the Iranian regime's terrorism, regional proxy war, internal suppression, and for other purposes. ↗Feb 26, 2025
- Sponsored HR 1133: Repeal Community Development Block Grants Act of 2025 ↗Feb 7, 2025
- Sponsored HJRES 8: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide certain line item veto authority to the President. ↗Jan 3, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 471
- Nay
- 162
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 22
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Yea
- HR1501Yea
- HJRES1Yea
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HRES1490Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Yea
- HCONRES89Nay
- HCONRES113Yea
- HR7008Yea
- HR7008Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
1 position on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.