This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Victoria Spartz's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

RepublicanVictoria Spartz
U.S. Representative · Indiana
Indiana's 5th district
U.S. Representative from Indiana
0 tracked promises
How they won their seat
Victoria Spartz won the 2024 U.S. House election in Indiana (District 5) with 56.6% of the vote (203,293 votes).
- Victoria Spartz · Republican56.6%203,293
- Deborah A. Pickett · Democrat38%136,554
- Robby Slaughter · Independent2.7%9,790
- Lauri Shillings · Libertarian2.7%9,567
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Victoria Spartz's record shows a concentration on healthcare-related legislation, with sponsored bills related to patient choice, hospital accountability, and addressing anti-competitive practices within the healthcare system. Additionally, she has sponsored several bills related to agricultural issues, including farm equipment safety and repair rights. Her voting record reflects alignment with her party. Focus areas (from the record): Healthcare Accountability · Patient Choice · Agricultural Safety · Anti-Competitive Practices · Economic Policy Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against her legislative activity, making it impossible to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal her specific motivations for sponsoring bills; There is no information on her effectiveness in passing legislation or influencing policy; The absence of declared positions limits understanding of her broader political philosophy. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Victoria Spartz has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2023. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Victoria Spartz has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score.
- Bills sponsored
- 11
Roll-call data last updated July 20, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$383K38%
- Large individual (itemized)$570K57%
- PAC / committee$45K5%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, Joint Economic CommitteeOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
41 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $1,085,504, spent $1,287,586, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9658: Nuclear Regulatory Modernization Act of 2026 ↗Jul 13, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7851: Checkoff Transparency Act ↗Mar 5, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7850: Farm Freedom to Repair Act ↗Mar 5, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7849: Farm Equipment Safety Act ↗Mar 5, 2026
- Sponsored HR 3222: SMART Health Care Act ↗May 6, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3020: Addressing Anti-Competitive Health Care Contract Clauses Act ↗Apr 24, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3019: Holding Nonprofit Hospitals Accountable Act ↗Apr 24, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3016: Combatting Hospital Monopolies Act ↗Apr 24, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3023: Preventing Hospital Overbilling of Medicare Act ↗Apr 24, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3022: Restoring Rights of Physicians to Own Hospitals Act ↗Apr 24, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3021: Empowering Patient Choice of Medical Care Act ↗Apr 24, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3017: Measuring State Healthcare Freedom Act ↗Apr 24, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 609
- Yea
- 424
- Nay
- 144
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 41
Full voting record
609 votes- HR9237Nay
- HR5362Yea
- HR8595Yea
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Yea
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Yea
- HR8595Yea
- HR1181Yea
- HR1181Nay
- HR139Yea
- HRES1423Yea
- HRES1423Yea
- HR8897Yea
- HR3106Yea
- HRES1399Yea
- HCONRES108Nay
- HRES1398Nay
- HRES1398Yea
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Stated positions
No stated positions are on record for this official yet. A stated position is what the official says they believe on an issue — a sourced claim, separate from any assessment of what they did. Know one? Add it with a link to where it was said.
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info
Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.