This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Warren Davidson's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

RepublicanWarren Davidson
U.S. Representative · Ohio
Ohio's 8th district
U.S. Representative from Ohio
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Warren Davidson won the 2024 U.S. House election in Ohio (District 8) with 62.8% of the vote (237,503 votes).
- Warren Davidson · Republican62.8%237,503
- Vanessa Enoch · Democrat37.2%140,625
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Warren Davidson's record demonstrates legislative activity related to financial oversight, national security, and reform in various sectors, as evidenced by his sponsorship of bills like the 'Dollar Dominance Act of 2025' and the 'Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2026'. His committee memberships further emphasize his involvement in financial services and foreign affairs, particularly in areas related to illicit finance and digital assets. Focus areas (from the record): Financial Oversight · National Security · Digital Assets · Foreign Affairs · Surveillance Reform Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against Davidson's legislative activity, making alignment assessment not determinable. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills; There is no information on Davidson's unlogged work or informal activities; The absence of declared positions limits understanding of his broader policy priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Warren Davidson has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2021. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Warren Davidson has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$46K6%
- Large individual (itemized)$279K37%
- PAC / committee$436K57%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Financial ServicesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Foreign AffairsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Chairman, House Committee on Financial Services — National Security, Illicit Finance, and International Financial InstitutionsOn record since Jan 2025Chair
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Digital Assets, Financial Technology, and Artificial IntelligenceOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Foreign Affairs — EuropeOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Capital MarketsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Foreign Affairs — Oversight and IntelligenceOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
130 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $505,528, spent $451,202, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 8962: PERFECT Act of 2026 ↗May 21, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7901: Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2026 ↗Mar 12, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7866: American Lending Fairness Act of 2026 ↗Mar 9, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7688: DPA Modernization Act of 2026 ↗Feb 25, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6624: Biological Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2025 ↗Dec 11, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6180: Bitcoin for America Act ↗Nov 20, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5136: Dollar Dominance Act of 2025 ↗Sep 4, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4789: FAIR Act ↗Jul 29, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4645: NARCO Act of 2025 ↗Jul 23, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 548: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives to commend President Donald J. Trump for his successful diplomatic efforts in deescalating the recent armed conflict between India and Pakistan. ↗Jun 26, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3582: No revolving doors in FMS Act of 2025 ↗May 23, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3432: TDS Research Act of 2025 ↗May 15, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 130 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 485
- Nay
- 153
- Present
- 2
- Not voting
- 15
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Yea
- HJRES1Yea
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HRES1490Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HR6500Nay
- S32Nay
- S307Nay
- HR8884Yea
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR7008Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
1 position on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.