Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account

This record is only as complete as the public makes it

No one has catalogued Yassamin Ansari's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

Yassamin Ansari

DemocratYassamin Ansari

U.S. Representative · Arizona

Arizona's 3rd district

DemocratFederal

U.S. Representative from Arizona

0 tracked promises

Arizona · Arizona's 3rd district

Arizona's 3rd district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →

Trust rating

Not yet rated

Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.

Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.

A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →

How they won their seat

Yassamin Ansari won the 2024 U.S. House election in Arizona (District 3) with 70.9% of the vote (143,336 votes).

70.9%
Win share
143,336
Votes for winner
202,065
Total cast
  • Yassamin Ansari · Democrat70.9%
  • Jeff Zink · Republican26.6%
  • Alan Aversa · Green2.5%
  • 1 Other Candidate0%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

Yassamin Ansari's record includes sponsored bills related to healthcare, particularly women's health and mental health, as evidenced by sponsored bills such as the Reproductive Healthcare Leave Act and the Mental Health Emergency Responder Act. Additionally, it includes sponsored bills related to immigration reform and human rights, demonstrated by the Iranian Temporary Immigration Relief Act and various resolutions supporting the Iranian people. Her committee memberships align with oversight and energy policy. Focus areas (from the record): Healthcare · Women's Rights · Mental Health · Immigration Reform · Human Rights · Energy Policy Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against her legislative activity, making it impossible to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills; There is no information on the politician's motives or intentions; The absence of declared positions limits understanding of her priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Yassamin Ansari has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Activity in office

What Yassamin Ansari has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.

Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Monthly voting activity

  • Yea
  • Nay
  • Total
016324864VotesSep '25: 15 YeaSep '25: 49 NaySep '25Nov '25: 7 YeaNov '25: 16 NayNov '25Dec '25: 24 YeaDec '25: 32 NayDec '25Jan '26: 23 YeaJan '26: 24 NayJan '26Feb '26: 13 YeaFeb '26: 17 NayFeb '26Mar '26: 12 YeaMar '26: 18 NayMar '26Apr '26: 20 YeaApr '26: 25 NayApr '26May '26: 17 YeaMay '26: 19 NayMay '26Jun '26: 25 YeaJun '26: 17 NayJun '26Jul '26: 14 YeaJul '26: 35 NayJul '26Aug '26: 2 YeaAug '26: 0 NayAug '26Sep '26: 2 YeaSep '26: 8 NaySep '26Sep '25: 64 totalNov '25: 23 totalDec '25: 57 totalJan '26: 47 totalFeb '26: 30 totalMar '26: 30 totalApr '26: 47 totalMay '26: 36 totalJun '26: 42 totalJul '26: 50 totalAug '26: 2 totalSep '26: 10 total
Measures voted on:492 passed162 failed1 procedural/other

Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.

Vote attendance

98.2%
attendance
643 of 655 roll calls12 missed
Monthly participation rate
0255075100100%Sep 25Dec 25Feb 26Apr 26Jun 26Aug 26Sep 26

Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

32bills sponsored
32 pending
05101520Bills2025: 20 pending2020252026: 12 pending122026

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Independence

3%
Votes against own party
18 of 643 recent votes

How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.

Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 32 sponsored bills became law
32 pending

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$4.3M
Raised, 20242026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5M2024: raised $2.9M2024: spent $2.9M20242026: raised $1.4M2026: spent $896K20262024: cash on hand $02026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $145K (11%)11%Large individual (itemized): $977K (72%)72%PAC / committee: $226K (17%)17%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$145K11%
  • Large individual (itemized)$977K72%
  • PAC / committee$226K17%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Verified record

32 sponsored bills · finance on file

Facts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.

Campaign financeas of Mar 31, 2026

FEC 2026 cycle — raised $1,217,963, spent $699,381, cash on hand $0.

View the FEC filing ↗

Voting record

Total votes
655
Yea
268
Nay
375
Present
0
Not voting
12

Full voting record

655 votes
  • S32Yea
  • S307Yea
120 of 655
Page 1 / 33

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Positions on record

3 positions on record

The record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.

  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position

    On record urging congressional leadership to attach Fourth Amendment protections to FISA Section 702 reauthorization: closing the data broker loophole and requiring a judicial warrant before the government accesses Americans' sensitive information, ending the Section 702 backdoor search loophole, and repealing the Section 702 'visa vetting' provision.

    SourcesLetter from 53 Members of Congress to Speaker Mike Johnson, Leader John Thune, Leader Charles E. Schumer and Leader Hakeem Jeffries urging Fourth Amendment protections in FISA Section 702 reauthorization
    View position & sources
  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position

    On record objecting to ICE's acquisition of Penlink tools that collect and search cellphone location data across entire neighborhoods, and demanding that DHS identify any legal justification for mass electronic surveillance conducted without a judicial or administrative warrant.

    SourcesLetter from Rep. Shontel M. Brown and 12 colleagues to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem on ICE's acquisition of Penlink neighborhood-scale cellphone location surveillance
    View position & sources
  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position

    On record objecting to ICE activating a contract for Paragon Solutions' Graphite phone-hacking spyware, and questioning whether ICE's use of spyware can be squared with Fourth Amendment protections against warrantless search and seizure.

    SourcesLetter from Reps. Summer L. Lee, Shontel M. Brown and Yassamin Ansari to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem on ICE's use of Paragon Solutions' Graphite spyware
    View position & sources
Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Suggest a correction to this official's info

See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Office context & community edit history

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →