Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Yvette D. Clarke

DemocratYvette D. Clarke

U.S. Representative · New York

New York's 9th district

DemocratFederal

U.S. Representative from New York

1 tracked promise

New York · New York's 9th district

New York's 9th district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →

Trust rating

Not yet rated

Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.

Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.

A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →

How they won their seat

Yvette D. Clarke won the 2024 U.S. House election in New York (District 9) with 73.5% of the vote (173,207 votes).

73.5%
Win share
173,207
Votes for winner
253,334
Total cast
  • Yvette D. Clarke · Democrat73.5%
  • Menachem M. Raitport · Conservative25.5%
  • Blank · Na7.4%
  • 1 Other Candidate1%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

Yvette D. Clarke's record indicates a pattern of involvement in housing affordability, women's health, and civil rights, as evidenced by her sponsorship of bills such as the Affordable Housing and Area Median Income Fairness Act and the Moms Matter Act. Additionally, her involvement in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce indicates a concentration on issues related to energy, technology, and commerce. Focus areas (from the record): Housing Affordability · Women's Health · Civil Rights · Energy Policy · Technology Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. The absence of declared positions limits the ability to draw conclusions about alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not provide insight into the reasoning behind her legislative actions. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Yvette D. Clarke has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2026. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Yvette D. Clarke has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.

Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Monthly voting activity

  • Yea
  • Nay
  • Total
013263952VotesJan '26: 24 YeaJan '26: 23 NayJan '26Feb '26: 14 YeaFeb '26: 15 NayFeb '26Mar '26: 11 YeaMar '26: 15 NayMar '26Apr '26: 22 YeaApr '26: 25 NayApr '26May '26: 19 YeaMay '26: 17 NayMay '26Jun '26: 22 YeaJun '26: 16 NayJun '26Jul '26: 14 YeaJul '26: 36 NayJul '26Aug '26: 2 YeaAug '26: 0 NayAug '26Sep '26: 3 YeaSep '26: 7 NaySep '26Jan '26: 47 totalFeb '26: 30 totalMar '26: 30 totalApr '26: 47 totalMay '26: 36 totalJun '26: 42 totalJul '26: 50 totalAug '26: 2 totalSep '26: 10 total
Measures voted on:211 passed83 failed

Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.

Vote attendance

96.9%
attendance
285 of 294 roll calls9 missed
Monthly participation rate
0255075100100%Jan 26Mar 26May 26Jul 26Sep 26

Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

9bills sponsored
9 pending
035810Bills2026: 9 pending92026

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Independence

3%
Votes against own party
9 of 285 recent votes

How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.

Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 9 sponsored bills became law
9 pending

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$624K
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$250K$500K$750K$1M2026: raised $624K2026: spent $535K20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $54K (9%)9%Large individual (itemized): $193K (31%)31%PAC / committee: $370K (60%)60%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$54K9%
  • Large individual (itemized)$193K31%
  • PAC / committee$370K60%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Integrity

Not yet rated

No promises have been rated yet, so there is no Integrity Score to show. Lifecycle promises (in progress, not yet rated) are tracked but never scored.

The score, once promises are rated, is a signed −100…+100 breakdown weighted by significance and evidence confidence — never a single opaque grade. How this is measured.

Integrity over time

The integrity timeline appears here once this official's promises are rated. In office since Jan 2019.
Not yet scoredNot yet rated 1— tracked, but not counted toward Integrity

Topic coverage

1 promise across 1 topic

What this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.

  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock Safety1 promise

Evidence & significance

Evidence quality

Strongest source cited per promise.

  • Primary (official record)1100%

Significance mix

How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).

10
21
30
40
50

Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.

Tracked promises

1 tracked promise

Not yet rated

I promise to continue standing beside my colleagues in Congress and behind the American people until we know the necessary answers to how this defective technology can be used for effective law enforcement.

Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyPromised Dec 2022
SourcesOffice of Rep. Ted Lieu (U.S. House)

Verified record

201 sponsored bills

Facts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.

Voting record

Total votes
655
Yea
264
Nay
375
Present
0
Not voting
16

Full voting record

655 votes
  • S32Yea
  • S307Yea
120 of 655
Page 1 / 33

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Positions on record

5 positions on record

The record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.

  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position

    On record demanding that DHS and ICE account for their use of Palantir-developed data analytics together with Clearview AI facial recognition, PenLink, L3Harris stingray and Paragon Solutions phone surveillance, and objecting to a mass surveillance ecosystem that has swept in U.S. citizens observing or protesting immigration enforcement.

    SourcesLetter from Reps. Dan Goldman and Nydia M. Velazquez, Sen. Ron Wyden and 30 colleagues to DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and ICE Acting Director Todd M. Lyons on Palantir-developed data surveillance contracts
    View position & sources
  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position

    On record urging congressional leadership to attach Fourth Amendment protections to FISA Section 702 reauthorization: closing the data broker loophole and requiring a judicial warrant before the government accesses Americans' sensitive information, ending the Section 702 backdoor search loophole, and repealing the Section 702 'visa vetting' provision.

    SourcesLetter from 53 Members of Congress to Speaker Mike Johnson, Leader John Thune, Leader Charles E. Schumer and Leader Hakeem Jeffries urging Fourth Amendment protections in FISA Section 702 reauthorization
    View position & sources
  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position

    On record asserting that the government ordinarily must obtain a judicial warrant to compel cell phone location data, and urging the DHS Inspector General to open a second investigation into ICE and other DHS components purchasing Americans' location data from commercial data brokers without one.

    SourcesBicameral letter to DHS Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari requesting a second investigation of warrantless purchases of Americans' cell phone location data by ICE and other DHS components
    View position & sources
  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position

    I promise to continue standing beside my colleagues in Congress and behind the American people until we know the necessary answers to how this defective technology can be used for effective law enforcement.

    SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.
    View position & sources
  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position

    On record seeking disclosure of the FBI's facial recognition policies and usage, and raising First and Fourth Amendment objections to scanning people engaged in peaceful protest and to arrests resting on facial recognition matches.

    SourcesLetter from Rep. Ted W. Lieu, Sen. Jon Ossoff and Rep. Yvette D. Clarke to FBI Director Christopher A. Wray on facial recognition technology
    View position & sources
Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Suggest a correction to this official's info

See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Office context & community edit history

Help complete the record on this official

What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Yvette D. Clarke more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →