DemocratZoe Lofgren
U.S. Representative · California
California's 18th district
U.S. Representative from California
1 tracked promise
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Zoe Lofgren won the 2024 U.S. House election in California (District 18) with 64.6% of the vote (147,674 votes).
- Zoe Lofgren · Democrat64.6%147,674
- Peter D. Hernandez · Republican35.4%80,832
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Zoe Lofgren's record includes legislation related to technology, particularly in the areas of artificial intelligence and online privacy, as evidenced by her sponsorship of bills like the Workforce for AI Trust Act and the Online Privacy Act of 2026. Additionally, her involvement in immigration reform is highlighted by her sponsorship of the Farm Workforce Modernization Act. Focus areas (from the record): Artificial Intelligence · Online Privacy · Immigration Reform · Workforce Development · Judiciary Alignment with declared positions: Consistent. Lofgren's declared position on immigration aligns with her sponsorship of the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, which aims to create legal status for undocumented farm workers. Her committee assignments include those related to technology and workforce issues, and her sponsored bills reflect these areas. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of her sponsored bills or their impact on policy; There is no information on her statements or public communications that could provide insight into her priorities; The record does not indicate her level of engagement or influence within her committees. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Zoe Lofgren has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Activity in office
What Zoe Lofgren has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$22K2%
- Large individual (itemized)$846K63%
- PAC / committee$481K36%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Ranking Member, House Committee on Science, Space, and TechnologyOn record since Jan 2025Ranking
- Member, House Committee on the JudiciaryOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on the Judiciary — Immigration Integrity, Security, and EnforcementOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on the Judiciary — Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the InternetOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on the Judiciary — The Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and AntitrustOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Integrity
Not yet ratedNo promises have been rated yet, so there is no Integrity Score to show. Lifecycle promises (in progress, not yet rated) are tracked but never scored.
The score, once promises are rated, is a signed −100…+100 breakdown weighted by significance and evidence confidence — never a single opaque grade. How this is measured.
Integrity over time
Topic coverage
1 promise across 1 topicWhat this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.
- Immigration1 promise
Evidence & significance
Evidence quality
Strongest source cited per promise.
- Primary (official record)1100%
Significance mix
How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).
Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.
1 tracked promise
“Champion and pass the Farm Workforce Modernization Act to create a 'certified agricultural worker' legal status and a renewable path to lawful permanent residence for undocumented farm workers.”
Verified record
348 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $1,613,682, spent $1,237,078, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9439: Voluntary Consumer AI Disclosure Pilot Act ↗Jun 24, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9334: Workforce for AI Trust Act ↗Jun 18, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9259: Fair Day in Court for Kids Act of 2026 ↗Jun 11, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1348: A resolution expressing support for the James Lick Observatory celebrating their 150th anniversary on June 7, 2026, and recognizing its contributions to science and astronomy. ↗Jun 8, 2026
- Sponsored HJRES 154: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to the Adverse Effect Wage Rate. ↗Mar 26, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8111: Bankruptcy Venue Reform Act ↗Mar 26, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8014: Online Privacy Act of 2026 ↗Mar 19, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7836: Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2026 ↗Mar 5, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6870: GRACE Act ↗Dec 18, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6207: Chip EQUIP Act ↗Nov 20, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5449: Redistricting Reform Act of 2025 ↗Sep 18, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4999: Fusion Workforce Act ↗Aug 19, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 348 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 273
- Nay
- 370
- Present
- 2
- Not voting
- 10
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
4 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record urging congressional leadership to attach Fourth Amendment protections to FISA Section 702 reauthorization: closing the data broker loophole and requiring a judicial warrant before the government accesses Americans' sensitive information, ending the Section 702 backdoor search loophole, and repealing the Section 702 'visa vetting' provision.
SourcesLetter from 53 Members of Congress to Speaker Mike Johnson, Leader John Thune, Leader Charles E. Schumer and Leader Hakeem Jeffries urging Fourth Amendment protections in FISA Section 702 reauthorizationView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record asserting that the government ordinarily must obtain a judicial warrant to compel cell phone location data, and urging the DHS Inspector General to open a second investigation into ICE and other DHS components purchasing Americans' location data from commercial data brokers without one.
SourcesBicameral letter to DHS Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari requesting a second investigation of warrantless purchases of Americans' cell phone location data by ICE and other DHS componentsView position & sources → - ImmigrationStated position
Champion and pass the Farm Workforce Modernization Act to create a 'certified agricultural worker' legal status and a renewable path to lawful permanent residence for undocumented farm workers.
SourcesWikipediaCongress.gov· archivedView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Office context & community edit history
Help complete the record on this official
What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Zoe Lofgren more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.