Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Zoe Lofgren

DemocratZoe Lofgren

U.S. Representative · California

California's 18th district

DemocratFederal

U.S. Representative from California

1 tracked promise

California · California's 18th district

California's 18th district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →

How they won their seat

Zoe Lofgren won the 2024 U.S. House election in California (District 18) with 64.6% of the vote (147,674 votes).

64.6%
Win share
147,674
Votes for winner
228,506
Total cast
  • Zoe Lofgren · Democrat64.6%
  • Peter D. Hernandez · Republican35.4%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

Zoe Lofgren's record shows patterns in technology and workforce issues, as evidenced by her sponsorship of bills such as the 'Workforce for AI Trust Act' and the 'Bankruptcy Venue Reform Act.' Additionally, her involvement in committees related to science, technology, and immigration is involved in regulatory reform and workforce protection through her committee work. Focus areas (from the record): Technology · Workforce · Regulatory Reform · Immigration · Science Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against her sponsored bills and voting record. What this can't tell you: The politician's specific motives or intentions behind the sponsored bills; The effectiveness of the proposed legislation and its impact on constituents; Any unlogged work or activities outside of the official record. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Zoe Lofgren has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Activity in office

What Zoe Lofgren has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score.

Votes cast
609
Voted yea
260
Voted nay
337
Bills sponsored
348
Committees
5

Roll-call data last updated July 20, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Monthly voting activity

  • Yea
  • Nay
  • Total
016324864VotesJun '25: 16 YeaJun '25: 23 NayJun '25Jul '25: 10 YeaJul '25: 21 NayJul '25Sep '25: 15 YeaSep '25: 49 NaySep '25Nov '25: 8 YeaNov '25: 14 NayNov '25Dec '25: 25 YeaDec '25: 32 NayDec '25Jan '26: 23 YeaJan '26: 24 NayJan '26Feb '26: 12 YeaFeb '26: 17 NayFeb '26Mar '26: 12 YeaMar '26: 17 NayMar '26Apr '26: 24 YeaApr '26: 22 NayApr '26May '26: 19 YeaMay '26: 17 NayMay '26Jun '26: 25 YeaJun '26: 17 NayJun '26Jul '26: 7 YeaJul '26: 9 NayJul '26Jun '25: 40 totalJul '25: 33 totalSep '25: 64 totalNov '25: 23 totalDec '25: 57 totalJan '26: 47 totalFeb '26: 30 totalMar '26: 30 totalApr '26: 47 totalMay '26: 36 totalJun '26: 42 totalJul '26: 16 total
Measures voted on:463 passed145 failed1 procedural/other

Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.

Vote attendance

98.4%
attendance
599 of 609 roll calls10 missed
Monthly participation rate
0255075100100%Jun 25Sep 25Dec 25Feb 26Apr 26Jun 26Jul 26

Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

348bills sponsored
41 pending307 awaiting status
013253850Bills1995: 3 awaiting status319951996: 9 awaiting status919961997: 8 awaiting status819971998: 5 awaiting status519981999: 10 awaiting status1019992000: 6 awaiting status620002001: 12 awaiting status1220012002: 5 awaiting status520022003: 11 awaiting status1120032004: 6 awaiting status620042005: 11 awaiting status1120052006: 5 awaiting status520062007: 18 awaiting status1820072008: 23 awaiting status2320082009: 16 awaiting status1620092010: 11 awaiting status1120102011: 9 awaiting status920112012: 7 awaiting status720122013: 11 awaiting status1120132014: 6 awaiting status620142015: 17 awaiting status1720152016: 5 awaiting status520162017: 14 awaiting status1420172018: 4 awaiting status420182019: 29 awaiting status2920192020: 9 awaiting status920202021: 23 awaiting status2320212022: 14 awaiting status1420222023: 11 pending1120232024: 7 pending720242025: 15 pending1520252026: 8 pending82026

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Independence

3%
Votes against own party
15 of 597 recent votes

How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.

Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 41 sponsored bills became law
41 pending

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$533K
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$250K$500K$750K$1M2026: raised $533K2026: spent $599K20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $46K (9%)9%Large individual (itemized): $198K (38%)38%PAC / committee: $281K (54%)54%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$46K9%
  • Large individual (itemized)$198K38%
  • PAC / committee$281K54%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Integrity

Not yet rated

No promises have been rated yet, so there is no Integrity Score to show. Lifecycle promises (in progress, not yet rated) are tracked but never scored.

The score, once promises are rated, is a signed −100…+100 breakdown weighted by significance and evidence confidence — never a single opaque grade. How this is measured.

Integrity over time

The integrity timeline appears here once this official's promises are rated. In office since Jan 2019.
Not yet scoredNot yet rated 1— tracked, but not counted toward Integrity

Topic coverage

1 promise across 1 topic

What this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.

  • Immigration1 promise

Evidence & significance

Evidence quality

Strongest source cited per promise.

  • Primary (official record)1100%

Significance mix

How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).

10
20
30
40
51

Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.

Tracked promises

1 tracked promise

Not yet rated

Champion and pass the Farm Workforce Modernization Act to create a 'certified agricultural worker' legal status and a renewable path to lawful permanent residence for undocumented farm workers.

ImmigrationSpecific · measurablePromised Jan 2025
Sourceshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farm_Workforce_Modernization_Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3227

Voting record

Total votes
609
Yea
260
Nay
337
Present
2
Not voting
10

Full voting record

609 votes
120 of 609
Page 1 / 31

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Stated positions

1 position on record

What this official says they believe — sourced claims, shown distinctly from tracked promises and from any assessment of what they did. A stated position is never scored and never affects the Integrity Score.

  • ImmigrationStated position

    Champion and pass the Farm Workforce Modernization Act to create a 'certified agricultural worker' legal status and a renewable path to lawful permanent residence for undocumented farm workers.

    Sourceshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farm_Workforce_Modernization_Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3227
    View position & sources →
Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info

Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Help complete the record on this official

What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Zoe Lofgren more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →