This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Gabe Amo's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratGabe Amo
U.S. Representative · Rhode Island
Rhode Island's 1st district
U.S. Representative from Rhode Island
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Gabe Amo won the 2024 U.S. House election in Rhode Island (District 1) with 63% of the vote (139,352 votes).
- Gabe Amo · Democrat63%139,352
- Allen Rodney Waters · Republican32%70,742
- C. D. Reynolds · Independent4.7%10,463
- 1 Other Candidate0.3%561
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Gabe Amo's record includes legislative actions in areas such as foreign relations, environmental issues, and social welfare. He has sponsored bills related to international diplomacy, including the 'Promoting Diplomacy with Australia Act' and the 'AUKUS Improvement Act of 2025', as well as domestic issues like the 'STOP Scams Against Seniors Act' and the 'Social Security Survivor Benefits Equity Act'. His voting record indicates a pattern of voting with the majority, with a low percentage of votes against it. Focus areas (from the record): Foreign Relations · Environmental Policy · Social Welfare · Technology and Innovation · Public Safety Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against his legislative activity. Therefore, alignment cannot be assessed due to a lack of evidence. What this can't tell you: The effectiveness of the sponsored bills, as none have become law; Any unlogged work or informal activities that may influence his political stance. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Gabe Amo has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Activity in office
What Gabe Amo has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$37K2%
- Large individual (itemized)$1.0M59%
- PAC / committee$654K38%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Science, Space, and TechnologyOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Foreign AffairsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on the BudgetOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Ranking Member, House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology — EnvironmentOn record since Jan 2025Ranking
- Member, House Committee on Foreign Affairs — East Asia and PacificOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Foreign Affairs — EuropeOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
26 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $1,158,839, spent $540,892, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HRES 1358: Honoring the victims and survivors of the December 13, 2025, mass shooting at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. ↗Jun 11, 2026
- Sponsored HCONRES 103: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. ↗May 20, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1218: Recognizing the importance of the special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom and welcoming the visit of King Charles III to the United States. ↗Apr 28, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8288: Strengthening Export Controls Compliance Act ↗Apr 15, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7896: NOAA Global Ocean Monitoring and Observing Research Act ↗Mar 12, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7307: SUPPLIES Act ↗Feb 2, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7089: PARK Act ↗Jan 15, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7088: NO NATO for Purchase Act ↗Jan 15, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6426: STOP Scams Against Seniors Act ↗Dec 4, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6425: National Strategy for Combating Scams Act of 2025 ↗Dec 4, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6424: Social Security Survivor Benefits Equity Act ↗Dec 4, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6123: Promoting Diplomacy with Australia Act ↗Nov 19, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 281
- Nay
- 373
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 1
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
2 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record demanding that DHS and ICE account for their use of Palantir-developed data analytics together with Clearview AI facial recognition, PenLink, L3Harris stingray and Paragon Solutions phone surveillance, and objecting to a mass surveillance ecosystem that has swept in U.S. citizens observing or protesting immigration enforcement.
SourcesLetter from Reps. Dan Goldman and Nydia M. Velazquez, Sen. Ron Wyden and 30 colleagues to DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and ICE Acting Director Todd M. Lyons on Palantir-developed data surveillance contractsView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.