Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account

This record is only as complete as the public makes it

No one has catalogued Gabe Amo's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

Gabe Amo

DemocratGabe Amo

U.S. Representative · Rhode Island

Rhode Island's 1st district

DemocratFederal

U.S. Representative from Rhode Island

0 tracked promises

Rhode Island · Rhode Island's 1st district

Rhode Island's 1st district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →

Running against

How they won their seat

Gabe Amo won the 2024 U.S. House election in Rhode Island (District 1) with 63% of the vote (139,352 votes).

63%
Win share
139,352
Votes for winner
221,118
Total cast
  • Gabe Amo · Democrat63%
  • Allen Rodney Waters · Republican32%
  • C. D. Reynolds · Independent4.7%
  • 1 Other Candidate0.3%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

Gabe Amo's record includes legislative actions in areas such as foreign relations, environmental issues, and social welfare. He has sponsored bills related to international diplomacy, including the 'Promoting Diplomacy with Australia Act' and the 'AUKUS Improvement Act of 2025', as well as domestic issues like the 'STOP Scams Against Seniors Act' and the 'Social Security Survivor Benefits Equity Act'. His voting record indicates a pattern of voting with the majority, with a low percentage of votes against it. Focus areas (from the record): Foreign Relations · Environmental Policy · Social Welfare · Technology and Innovation · Public Safety Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against his legislative activity. Therefore, alignment cannot be assessed due to a lack of evidence. What this can't tell you: The effectiveness of the sponsored bills, as none have become law; Any unlogged work or informal activities that may influence his political stance. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Gabe Amo has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2023–2025 term. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Gabe Amo has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score.

Votes cast
4
Voted yea
1
Voted nay
3
Bills sponsored
4
Committees
6

Roll-call data last updated July 20, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Monthly voting activity

  • Yea
  • Nay
  • Total
01234VotesJan '25: 1 YeaJan '25: 3 NayJan '25Jan '25: 4 total
Measures voted on:2 passed1 failed1 procedural/other

Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.

Vote attendance

100%
attendance
4 of 4 roll calls0 missed

Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

4bills sponsored
4 pending
01234Bills2024: 4 pending42024

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Independence

0%
Votes against own party
0 of 4 recent votes

How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.

Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 4 sponsored bills became law
4 pending

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$3.7M
Raised, 20242026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5M2024: raised $2.6M2024: spent $1.6M20242026: raised $1.2M2026: spent $541K20262024: cash on hand $02026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $31K (3%)Large individual (itemized): $678K (59%)59%PAC / committee: $434K (38%)38%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$31K3%
  • Large individual (itemized)$678K59%
  • PAC / committee$434K38%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Verified record

26 sponsored bills · finance on file

Facts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.

Campaign financeas of Mar 31, 2026

FEC 2026 cycle — raised $1,158,839, spent $540,892, cash on hand $0.

View the FEC filing ↗

Voting record

Total votes
609
Yea
268
Nay
340
Present
0
Not voting
1

Full voting record

609 votes
120 of 609
Page 1 / 31

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Stated positions

No stated positions are on record for this official yet. A stated position is what the official says they believe on an issue — a sourced claim, separate from any assessment of what they did. Know one? Add it with a link to where it was said.

Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info

Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →