Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Jodey C. Arrington

RepublicanJodey C. Arrington

U.S. Representative · Texas

Texas's 19th district

RepublicanFederal

U.S. Representative from Texas

1 tracked promise, 1 rated

Texas · Texas's 19th district

Texas's 19th district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →
88/100
Trust rating
Strongly keeps promises
88
0 · Broken50 · Mixed100 · Kept
A transparent rescale of the Integrity Score (+75) to 0–100, aggregated from 1 rated promise. Never an opaque single score. Provisional — based on 1 rated promise they could act on; a settled rating needs at least 5.
How this is calculated →

How they won their seat

Jodey C. Arrington won the 2024 U.S. House election in Texas (District 19) with 80.7% of the vote (214,950 votes).

80.7%
Win share
214,950
Votes for winner
266,375
Total cast
  • Jodey C. Arrington · Republican80.7%
  • Nathan Lewis · Independent10.3%
  • Bernard Johnson · Libertarian9%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

Jodey C. Arrington's record shows a focus on tax-related legislation, government accountability, and military welfare. Notable sponsored bills include the 'Applying Existing Tax Anti-Abuse Rules to Digital Assets Act' and the 'Prevent Government Shutdowns Act.' His committee memberships on the House Committee on Ways and Means and as Chair of the House Committee on the Budget further emphasize his legislative activity includes fiscal policy. Focus areas (from the record): Tax Policy · Government Accountability · Military Welfare · Trade · Health Care Alignment with declared positions: Consistent. Arrington's declared position on enacting congressional term limits aligns with his sponsorship of H.J.Res.134. However, most of his legislative activity is in fiscal and accountability areas. What this can't tell you: The motivations behind his legislative choices are not disclosed; The effectiveness of his sponsored bills is not assessed in this record; There is no information on his public statements or responses to constituents. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Jodey C. Arrington has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2019. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Jodey C. Arrington has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.

Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

10bills sponsored
10 awaiting status
035810Bills2019: 10 awaiting status102019

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 0 sponsored bills became law

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$3.3M
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5M2026: raised $3.3M2026: spent $2.7M20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $16K (1%)Large individual (itemized): $538K (25%)25%PAC / committee: $1.6M (74%)74%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$16K1%
  • Large individual (itemized)$538K25%
  • PAC / committee$1.6M74%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Source: Congress.gov.

Integrity

Promises kept vs. worked against — weighted breakdown

+75 · based on 1 rated promise

  • Championed 1

Teal segments are promises kept; amber and stone segments are promises worked against. The signed score weights each rated promise by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is shown separately from popularity, finance, disclosure, and stated positions. Methodology is open.

Integrity over time

In office since Jan 2019 · 1 rated promise

The line steps at each recorded assessment and holds between them; it ends on the current published score.

−100 worked against0+100 kept
Integrity Score by assessment date. Score ranges from −100 (worked against) to +100 (kept).
DateIntegrity Score
Jul 202675
Jan 202775 (current, held from last rating)

Promise status over time

How the tracked promise record has evolved.

1 tracked
  • Kept1
  • Against0
  • No opportunity0
  • In progress0
011Jul 2026

Replayed from this official’s sourced assessment history — the bands step only when an assessment is recorded or changed. Based on the most recent roll-call votes on file and the tracked promise assessments; never interpolated.

Topic coverage

1 promise across 1 topic

What this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.

  • Term limits / government reform1 promise

Evidence & significance

Evidence quality

Strongest source cited per promise.

  • Primary (official record)1100%

Significance mix

How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).

10
20
30
40
51

Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.

Tracked promises

1 tracked promise

Championedhigh confidence

Enact congressional term limits — a constitutional amendment capping service in Congress at 12 years. Arrington introduced H.J.Res.134 in the 115th Congress to impose these limits and campaigned on it as 'the only bipartisan term limits bill.'

Term limits / government reformSpecific · measurablePromised May 2018
SourcesU.S. Term LimitsGovInfo (U.S. Government Publishing Office)· archivedJodey Arrington campaign website (archived)GovInfo (U.S. Government Publishing Office)· archivedCongress.gov (Library of Congress)· archived

Voting record

Total votes
655
Yea
486
Nay
147
Present
0
Not voting
22

Full voting record

655 votes
  • S32Yea
  • S307Yea
  • HR8884Not voting
120 of 655
Page 1 / 33

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Positions on record

2 positions on record

The record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.

  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote

    On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.

    SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.
    View position & sources
  • Term limits / government reformStated position

    Enact congressional term limits — a constitutional amendment capping service in Congress at 12 years. Arrington introduced H.J.Res.134 in the 115th Congress to impose these limits and campaigned on it as 'the only bipartisan term limits bill.'

    SourcesJodey Arrington campaign website (archived)Congress.gov (Library of Congress)· archived
    View position & sources
Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Suggest a correction to this official's info

See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Office context & community edit history

Help complete the record on this official

What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Jodey C. Arrington more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →