This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Marlin A. Stutzman's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

RepublicanMarlin A. Stutzman
U.S. Representative · Indiana
Indiana's 3rd district
U.S. Representative from Indiana
0 tracked promises
How they won their seat
Marlin A. Stutzman won the 2024 U.S. House election in Indiana (District 3) with 65% of the vote (202,653 votes).
- Marlin A. Stutzman · Republican65%202,653
- Kiley M. Adolph · Democrat31.4%97,871
- Jarrad Lancaster · Libertarian3.5%11,015
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Marlin A. Stutzman's record indicates a pattern of involvement in financial services, regulatory oversight, and issues related to Second Amendment rights. He has sponsored multiple bills aimed at enhancing regulatory effectiveness (e.g., HR 8278), promoting transparency in financial institutions (e.g., HR 5569), and supporting gun rights (e.g., HR 923). Additionally, his committee memberships reflect a concentration on financial services and budgetary matters. Focus areas (from the record): Financial Services · Regulatory Oversight · Second Amendment Rights · Transparency · Economic Policy Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There is a lack of declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against Stutzman's sponsored bills and voting record. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Marlin A. Stutzman has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2022. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$87K14%
- Large individual (itemized)$245K40%
- PAC / committee$275K45%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Financial ServicesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on the BudgetOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Digital Assets, Financial Technology, and Artificial IntelligenceOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Capital MarketsOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
40 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $705,870, spent $681,804, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HRES 1339: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's initiative to transition the United States-Israel relationship toward mutual defense cooperation and joint economic investment, recognizing the contributions of Israel to joint military operations against Iran, and condemning the global rise of antisemitism. ↗Jun 3, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8278: Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act ↗Apr 14, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8155: Foreign Propaganda Transparency Act ↗Mar 27, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8090: To require the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the National Credit Union Administration to carry out an analysis to determine whether insurance coverage should be raised on covered transaction accounts, and for other purposes. ↗Mar 25, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7586: American Families First Act ↗Feb 13, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7237: Chemical Abortion Risk Awareness Act ↗Jan 23, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6541: Regulation A+ Improvement Act of 2025 ↗Dec 9, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5808: Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act of 2025 ↗Oct 21, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4989: Streamlining Rural Housing Act of 2025 ↗Aug 15, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4737: Apeel Reveal Act of 2025 ↗Jul 23, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3787: Emergency Spending Accountability Act ↗Jun 5, 2025
- Sponsored HR 2393: Protect American Beef Act. ↗Mar 26, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 609
- Yea
- 458
- Nay
- 131
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 20
Full voting record
609 votes- HR9237Nay
- HR5362Yea
- HR8595Yea
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Yea
- HR8595Nay
- HR1181Yea
- HR1181Nay
- HR139Yea
- HRES1423Yea
- HRES1423Yea
- HR8897Yea
- HR3106Yea
- HRES1399Yea
- HCONRES108Nay
- HRES1398Yea
- HRES1398Yea
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Stated positions
No stated positions are on record for this official yet. A stated position is what the official says they believe on an issue — a sourced claim, separate from any assessment of what they did. Know one? Add it with a link to where it was said.
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info
Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.