Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Michael Guest

RepublicanMichael Guest

U.S. Representative · Mississippi

Mississippi's 3rd district

RepublicanFederal

U.S. Representative from Mississippi

1 tracked promise, 1 rated

Mississippi · Mississippi's 3rd district

Mississippi's 3rd district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →
100/100
Trust rating
Strongly keeps promises
100
0 · Broken50 · Mixed100 · Kept
A transparent rescale of the Integrity Score (+100) to 0–100, aggregated from 1 rated promise. Never an opaque single score. Provisional — based on 1 rated promise they could act on; a settled rating needs at least 5.
How this is calculated →

How they won their seat

Michael Guest won the 2024 U.S. House election in Mississippi (District 3) with 100% of the vote (265,159 votes).

100%
Win share
265,159
Votes for winner
265,159
Total cast
  • Michael Guest · Republican100%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

Michael Guest's record includes multiple resolutions commemorating military and law enforcement personnel, such as HRES 1320 and HRES 1252. Additionally, he has sponsored legislation addressing issues related to drug trafficking and rural health, including HR 4071 and HR 3102. His committee memberships include military construction, veterans affairs, and homeland security. Focus areas (from the record): Veterans Affairs · Law Enforcement · Drug Trafficking · Rural Health · Homeland Security Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. It is not possible to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The effectiveness of the sponsored bills, as none have become law; Guest's specific motives or intentions behind the sponsored legislation; Any unlogged work or informal activities that may influence his legislative focus. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Michael Guest has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2021. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Michael Guest has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.

Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

9bills sponsored
9 awaiting status
035810Bills2021: 9 awaiting status92021

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 0 sponsored bills became law

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$823K
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$250K$500K$750K$1M2026: raised $823K2026: spent $372K20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $5K (1%)Large individual (itemized): $446K (54%)54%PAC / committee: $370K (45%)45%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$5K1%
  • Large individual (itemized)$446K54%
  • PAC / committee$370K45%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Integrity

Promises kept vs. worked against — weighted breakdown

+100 · based on 1 rated promise

  • Fully Kept 1

Teal segments are promises kept; amber and stone segments are promises worked against. The signed score weights each rated promise by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is shown separately from popularity, finance, disclosure, and stated positions. Methodology is open.

Integrity over time

In office since Jan 2019 · 1 rated promise

The line steps at each recorded assessment and holds between them; it ends on the current published score.

−100 worked against0+100 kept
Integrity Score by assessment date. Score ranges from −100 (worked against) to +100 (kept).
DateIntegrity Score
Jul 2026100
Jan 2027100 (current, held from last rating)

Promise status over time

How the tracked promise record has evolved.

1 tracked
  • Kept1
  • Against0
  • No opportunity0
  • In progress0
011Jul 2026

Replayed from this official’s sourced assessment history — the bands step only when an assessment is recorded or changed. Based on the most recent roll-call votes on file and the tracked promise assessments; never interpolated.

Topic coverage

1 promise across 1 topic

What this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.

  • Government Ethics and Accountability1 promise

Evidence & significance

Evidence quality

Strongest source cited per promise.

  • Primary (official record)1100%

Significance mix

How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).

10
20
31
40
50

Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.

Tracked promises

1 tracked promise

Fully Kepthigh confidence

Sponsor a privileged House resolution to expel Rep. George Santos from Congress following the House Ethics Committee investigation.

Government Ethics and AccountabilityPromised Nov 2023
SourcesMagnolia TribuneCongress.gov (U.S. Library of Congress)· archivedGovTrack.usWikipediaOffice of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives· archivedCBS NewsGovTrack.us (H.Res. 878, 118th Congress)· archived

Verified record

53 sponsored bills · finance on file

Facts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.

Campaign financeas of Mar 31, 2026

FEC 2026 cycle — raised $762,781, spent $332,197, cash on hand $0.

View the FEC filing ↗

Sponsored legislation

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 sponsored measures.

Voting record

Total votes
655
Yea
503
Nay
141
Present
2
Not voting
9

Full voting record

655 votes
  • S32Yea
  • S307Yea
120 of 655
Page 1 / 33

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Positions on record

2 positions on record

The record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.

  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote

    On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.

    SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.
    View position & sources
  • Government Ethics and AccountabilityStated position

    Sponsor a privileged House resolution to expel Rep. George Santos from Congress following the House Ethics Committee investigation.

    SourcesGovTrack.usCongress.gov (U.S. Library of Congress)· archivedWikipedia
    View position & sources
Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Suggest a correction to this official's info

See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Office context & community edit history

Help complete the record on this official

What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Michael Guest more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →