Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Roger Williams

RepublicanRoger Williams

U.S. Representative · Texas

Texas's 25th district

RepublicanFederal

U.S. Representative from Texas

2 tracked promises, 2 rated

Texas · Texas's 25th district

Texas's 25th district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →
45/100
Trust rating
Mixed record
45
0 · Broken50 · Mixed100 · Kept
A transparent rescale of the Integrity Score (-10) to 0–100, aggregated from 2 rated promises. Never an opaque single score.
How this is calculated →

How they won their seat

Roger Williams won the 2024 U.S. House election in Texas (District 25) with 99.4% of the vote (263,042 votes).

99.4%
Win share
263,042
Votes for winner
264,703
Total cast
  • Roger Williams · Republican99.4%
  • 1 Other Candidate0.6%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

The record indicates activity related to small business support, financial services, and law enforcement. Sponsored bills such as the 'Safer Schools Act of 2025' and the 'Bulletproof Law Enforcement Vehicles Act' indicate a pattern related to public safety, while the 'Merchant Banking Modernization Act' and various small business-related resolutions indicate activity related to economic issues. Focus areas (from the record): Small Business · Public Safety · Financial Services · Economic Development · Second Amendment Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills; There is no information on the politician's motives or intentions; The absence of declared positions limits the ability to assess alignment with constituents' views. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Roger Williams has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2025–2027 term. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Roger Williams has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score.

Votes cast
609
Voted yea
453
Voted nay
131
Bills sponsored
38
Committees
4

Roll-call data last updated July 20, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Monthly voting activity

  • Yea
  • Nay
  • Total
016324864VotesJun '25: 32 YeaJun '25: 8 NayJun '25Jul '25: 25 YeaJul '25: 6 NayJul '25Sep '25: 49 YeaSep '25: 15 NaySep '25Nov '25: 21 YeaNov '25: 2 NayNov '25Dec '25: 35 YeaDec '25: 19 NayDec '25Jan '26: 31 YeaJan '26: 13 NayJan '26Feb '26: 23 YeaFeb '26: 7 NayFeb '26Mar '26: 24 YeaMar '26: 6 NayMar '26Apr '26: 33 YeaApr '26: 11 NayApr '26May '26: 29 YeaMay '26: 7 NayMay '26Jun '26: 29 YeaJun '26: 13 NayJun '26Jul '26: 9 YeaJul '26: 7 NayJul '26Jun '25: 40 totalJul '25: 33 totalSep '25: 64 totalNov '25: 23 totalDec '25: 57 totalJan '26: 47 totalFeb '26: 30 totalMar '26: 30 totalApr '26: 47 totalMay '26: 36 totalJun '26: 42 totalJul '26: 16 total
Measures voted on:463 passed145 failed1 procedural/other

Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.

Vote attendance

95.9%
attendance
584 of 609 roll calls25 missed
Monthly participation rate
0255075100100%Jun 25Sep 25Dec 25Feb 26Apr 26Jun 26Jul 26

Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

38bills sponsored
38 pending
013253850Bills2025: 35 pending3520252026: 3 pending32026

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Independence

2%
Votes against own party
12 of 584 recent votes

How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.

Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 38 sponsored bills became law
38 pending

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$1.7M
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$500K$1M$1.5M$2M2026: raised $1.7M2026: spent $1.2M20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $25K (2%)Large individual (itemized): $845K (58%)58%PAC / committee: $583K (40%)40%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$25K2%
  • Large individual (itemized)$845K58%
  • PAC / committee$583K40%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Integrity

Promises kept vs. worked against — weighted breakdown

−10 · based on 2 rated promises

  • Misaligned 1
  • Partial 1

Teal segments are promises kept; amber and stone segments are promises worked against. The signed score weights each rated promise by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is shown separately from popularity, finance, disclosure, and stated positions. Methodology is open.

Integrity over time

In office since Jan 2019 · 2 rated promises

Each step is a real change in the sourced record — the score holds between assessments.

−100 worked against0+100 kept

Promise status over time

How the tracked promise record has evolved.

2 tracked
  • Kept1
  • Against1
  • No opportunity0
  • In progress0
01122Jul 2026Jul 2026

Replayed from this official’s sourced assessment history — the bands step only when an assessment is recorded or changed. Based on the most recent roll-call votes on file and the tracked promise assessments; never interpolated.

Topic coverage

2 promises across 2 topics

What this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.

  • Budget & Spending1 promise
  • Government Spending1 promise

Evidence & significance

Evidence quality

Strongest source cited per promise.

  • Primary (official record)2100%

Significance mix

How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).

10
20
30
41
51

Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.

Tracked promises

2 tracked promises

Partialmedium confidence

Support a federal Balanced Budget Amendment and oppose efforts to raise the debt ceiling.

Budget & SpendingSpecific · measurable
Sourceshttps://web.archive.org/web/20140130234100/http://www.rogerforcongress.com/issues/balancing-the-budgethttps://ballotpedia.org/Roger_Williams_(Texas)https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2018/roll138.xmlhttps://clerk.house.gov/evs/2023/roll243.xml
Misalignedhigh confidence

Oppose congressional earmarks.

Government SpendingSpecific · measurable
Sourceshttps://web.archive.org/web/20140130234100/http://www.rogerforcongress.com/issueshttps://ballotpedia.org/Roger_Williams_(Texas)https://williams.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-williams-secures-35-million-tarleton-state-universityshttps://www.tarleton.edu/news/congressman-williams-secures-3-5-million-for-tarleton-state-universitys-innovation-and-incubation-hub-site-preparation/https://www.texastribune.org/2025/09/29/texas-earmarks-congress-budget-negotiations-shutdown/

Voting record

Total votes
609
Yea
453
Nay
131
Present
0
Not voting
25

Full voting record

609 votes
120 of 609
Page 1 / 31

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Stated positions

2 positions on record

What this official says they believe — sourced claims, shown distinctly from tracked promises and from any assessment of what they did. A stated position is never scored and never affects the Integrity Score.

  • Government SpendingStated position

    Oppose congressional earmarks.

    Sourceshttps://web.archive.org/web/20140130234100/http://www.rogerforcongress.com/issueshttps://ballotpedia.org/Roger_Williams_(Texas)
    View position & sources →
  • Budget & SpendingStated position

    Support a federal Balanced Budget Amendment and oppose efforts to raise the debt ceiling.

    Sourceshttps://web.archive.org/web/20140130234100/http://www.rogerforcongress.com/issues/balancing-the-budgethttps://ballotpedia.org/Roger_Williams_(Texas)
    View position & sources →
Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info

Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Help complete the record on this official

What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Roger Williams more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →