Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Roger Williams

RepublicanRoger Williams

U.S. Representative · Texas

Texas's 25th district

RepublicanFederal

U.S. Representative from Texas

2 tracked promises, 2 rated

Texas · Texas's 25th district

Texas's 25th district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →
45/100
Trust rating
Mixed record
45
0 · Broken50 · Mixed100 · Kept
A transparent rescale of the Integrity Score (-10) to 0–100, aggregated from 2 rated promises. Never an opaque single score. Provisional — based on 2 rated promises they could act on; a settled rating needs at least 5.
How this is calculated →

How they won their seat

Roger Williams won the 2024 U.S. House election in Texas (District 25) with 99.4% of the vote (263,042 votes).

99.4%
Win share
263,042
Votes for winner
264,703
Total cast
  • Roger Williams · Republican99.4%
  • 1 Other Candidate0.6%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

The record includes sponsored bills and committee roles related to small business support, financial services, and regulatory reform. Notable sponsored bills include the 'Safer Schools Act of 2025' and the 'Freedom to Compete Act of 2025', alongside a significant role as Chair of the House Committee on Small Business. Additionally, the voting record indicates alignment with party positions, with only a small percentage of votes diverging from party lines. Focus areas (from the record): Small Business · Financial Services · Regulatory Reform · Education · Second Amendment Alignment with declared positions: Mixed. While the record shows support for small business initiatives and financial accountability, it partially aligns with the declared position of opposing congressional earmarks and supporting a Balanced Budget Amendment. However, the record does not provide specific actions related to spending issues. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills; There is no information on the politician's engagement outside of sponsored bills and votes; The absence of statements limits understanding of the politician's broader views or priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Roger Williams has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2025. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Roger Williams has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.

Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Monthly voting activity

  • Yea
  • Nay
  • Total
016324864VotesJan '25: 11 YeaJan '25: 3 NayJan '25Feb '25: 23 YeaFeb '25: 3 NayFeb '25Mar '25: 26 YeaMar '25: 6 NayMar '25Apr '25: 24 YeaApr '25: 2 NayApr '25May '25: 29 YeaMay '25: 3 NayMay '25Jun '25: 32 YeaJun '25: 8 NayJun '25Jul '25: 25 YeaJul '25: 6 NayJul '25Sep '25: 49 YeaSep '25: 15 NaySep '25Nov '25: 21 YeaNov '25: 2 NayNov '25Dec '25: 35 YeaDec '25: 19 NayDec '25Jan '25: 26 totalFeb '25: 26 totalMar '25: 32 totalApr '25: 27 totalMay '25: 33 totalJun '25: 40 totalJul '25: 33 totalSep '25: 64 totalNov '25: 23 totalDec '25: 57 total
Measures voted on:281 passed79 failed1 procedural/other

Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.

Vote attendance

94.7%
attendance
342 of 361 roll calls19 missed
Monthly participation rate
025507510094.7%Jan 25Mar 25May 25Jul 25Nov 25Dec 25

Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

35bills sponsored
35 pending
013253850Bills2025: 35 pending352025

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Independence

2%
Votes against own party
7 of 342 recent votes

How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.

Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 35 sponsored bills became law
35 pending

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$1.7M
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$500K$1M$1.5M$2M2026: raised $1.7M2026: spent $1.2M20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $25K (2%)Large individual (itemized): $845K (58%)58%PAC / committee: $583K (40%)40%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$25K2%
  • Large individual (itemized)$845K58%
  • PAC / committee$583K40%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Integrity

Promises kept vs. worked against — weighted breakdown

−10 · based on 2 rated promises

  • Misaligned 1
  • Partial 1

Teal segments are promises kept; amber and stone segments are promises worked against. The signed score weights each rated promise by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is shown separately from popularity, finance, disclosure, and stated positions. Methodology is open.

Integrity over time

In office since Jan 2019 · 2 rated promises

The line steps at each recorded assessment and holds between them; it ends on the current published score.

−100 worked against0+100 kept
Integrity Score by assessment date. Score ranges from −100 (worked against) to +100 (kept).
DateIntegrity Score
Jul 202650
Jul 2026-10
Jan 2027-10 (current, held from last rating)

Promise status over time

How the tracked promise record has evolved.

2 tracked
  • Kept1
  • Against1
  • No opportunity0
  • In progress0
01122Jul 2026Jul 2026

Replayed from this official’s sourced assessment history — the bands step only when an assessment is recorded or changed. Based on the most recent roll-call votes on file and the tracked promise assessments; never interpolated.

Topic coverage

2 promises across 2 topics

What this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.

  • Budget & Spending1 promise
  • Government Spending1 promise

Evidence & significance

Evidence quality

Strongest source cited per promise.

  • Primary (official record)2100%

Significance mix

How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).

10
20
30
41
51

Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.

Tracked promises

2 tracked promises

Partialmedium confidence

Support a federal Balanced Budget Amendment and oppose efforts to raise the debt ceiling.

Budget & SpendingSpecific · measurable
SourcesBallotpediaRoger Williams for Congress campaign website (archived)U.S. House of Representatives Clerk - Roll Call 138, 115th Congress (2018)· archivedU.S. House of Representatives Clerk - Roll Call 243, 118th Congress (2023)· archived
Misalignedhigh confidence

Oppose congressional earmarks.

Government SpendingSpecific · measurable
SourcesBallotpediaThe Texas TribuneRoger Williams for Congress campaign website (archived)Office of Congressman Roger Williams (williams.house.gov)Tarleton State University News

Voting record

Total votes
655
Yea
490
Nay
140
Present
0
Not voting
25

Full voting record

655 votes
  • S32Yea
  • S307Yea
120 of 655
Page 1 / 33

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Positions on record

3 positions on record

The record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.

  • Government SpendingStated position

    Oppose congressional earmarks.

    SourcesRoger Williams for Congress campaign website (archived)Ballotpedia
    View position & sources
  • Budget & SpendingStated position

    Support a federal Balanced Budget Amendment and oppose efforts to raise the debt ceiling.

    SourcesRoger Williams for Congress campaign website (archived)Ballotpedia
    View position & sources
  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote

    On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.

    SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.
    View position & sources
Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Suggest a correction to this official's info

See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Office context & community edit history

Help complete the record on this official

What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Roger Williams more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →