RepublicanTom Emmer
U.S. Representative · Minnesota
Minnesota's 6th district
U.S. Representative from Minnesota
4 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Tom Emmer won the 2024 U.S. House election in Minnesota (District 6) with 62.4% of the vote (260,095 votes).
- Tom Emmer · Republican62.4%260,095
- Jeanne Hendricks · Democratic-Farmer-Labor37.4%155,836
- 1 Other Candidate0.1%565
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Tom Emmer's record includes multiple sponsored bills related to financial regulation, particularly concerning cryptocurrency and digital assets, such as the Securities Clarity Act (H.R.2365) and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act (H.R.1919). Additionally, several bills are related to mental health services, including those aimed at securing facilities for mental health services and improving student mental health. Focus areas (from the record): Financial Regulation · Cryptocurrency · Mental Health Services · Election Integrity · Rural Issues Alignment with declared positions: Mixed. Emmer's sponsored bills align with his declared positions on cryptocurrency regulation and financial privacy, particularly through the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act and the Securities Clarity Act. However, there is insufficient evidence of declared claims on mental health services or rural issues, which are also prominent in his record. What this can't tell you: The effectiveness of the sponsored bills in achieving their intended outcomes; The full scope of Emmer's work outside of the sponsored bills and votes; Any potential changes in positions or priorities not reflected in the current record. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Tom Emmer has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2016. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Tom Emmer has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$499K11%
- Large individual (itemized)$1.6M34%
- PAC / committee$2.5M55%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Financial ServicesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Vice Chairman, House Committee on Financial Services — Digital Assets, Financial Technology, and Artificial IntelligenceOn record since Jan 2025Chair
Source: Congress.gov.
Integrity
Not yet ratedNo promises have been rated yet, so there is no Integrity Score to show. Lifecycle promises (in progress, not yet rated) are tracked but never scored.
The score, once promises are rated, is a signed −100…+100 breakdown weighted by significance and evidence confidence — never a single opaque grade. How this is measured.
Integrity over time
Topic coverage
4 promises across 3 topicsWhat this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.
- Cryptocurrency Regulation2
- Election Integrity1
- Financial Privacy1
Evidence & significance
Evidence quality
Strongest source cited per promise.
- Primary (official record)4100%
Significance mix
How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).
Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.
4 tracked promises
“Pass the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act (H.R.1919) into law to permanently prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing, developing, testing, or implementing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) directly to individuals.”
“Enact the Securities Clarity Act (H.R.2365) to amend the securities laws so that a digital token ('investment contract asset') is legally distinct from, and excluded from the definition of, the security it may have been sold as part of.”
“Enact the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (H.R.3533) to ensure non-custodial blockchain developers and service providers -- miners, validators, and wallet providers who do not control customer funds -- are not classified or regulated as money transmitters.”
“Advance the Minnesota Voter Integrity Act of 2026 (H.R.7320), which would withhold federal Help America Vote Act election-assistance funds from Minnesota until the Secretary of State cooperates with the Department of Justice's review of the state's voter registration and voting practices.”
Verified record
123 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $8,309,786, spent $5,409,564, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 7156: SCAM Act ↗Jan 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7030: Securing Facilities for Mental Health Services Act ↗Jan 13, 2026
- Sponsored HR 4398: Veteran Burial Timeliness and Death Certificate Accountability Act ↗Jul 15, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3533: Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act ↗May 21, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3234: Keeping Deposits Local Act ↗May 7, 2025
- Sponsored HR 2365: Securities Clarity Act of 2025 ↗Mar 26, 2025
- Sponsored HR 2184: Firearm Due Process Protection Act of 2025 ↗Mar 18, 2025
- Sponsored HR 2183: CFPB Dual Mandate and Economic Analysis Act ↗Mar 18, 2025
- Sponsored HR 1919: Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act ↗Mar 6, 2025
- Sponsored HR 8066: Ammunition Supply Chain Act ↗Apr 18, 2024
- Sponsored HR 7873: Firearm Due Process Protection Act ↗Apr 5, 2024
- Sponsored HR 7455: Sunset Act of 2024 ↗Feb 26, 2024
Showing the 12 most recent of 123 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 507
- Nay
- 139
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 9
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Yea
- HR1501Yea
- HJRES1Yea
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HRES1490Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Yea
- HCONRES89Nay
- HCONRES113Yea
- HR7008Yea
- HR7008Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
4 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Election IntegrityStated position
Advance the Minnesota Voter Integrity Act of 2026 (H.R.7320), which would withhold federal Help America Vote Act election-assistance funds from Minnesota until the Secretary of State cooperates with the Department of Justice's review of the state's voter registration and voting practices.
SourcesCongress.gov (Library of Congress)Quiver QuantitativeOffice of Congressman Tom Emmer· archivedView position & sources → - Financial PrivacyStated position
Pass the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act (H.R.1919) into law to permanently prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing, developing, testing, or implementing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) directly to individuals.
SourcesU.S. House Clerk Roll Call 201· archivedGovTrackRipon AdvanceCongress.gov (Library of Congress)· archivedOffice of Congressman Tom Emmer· archivedView position & sources → - Cryptocurrency RegulationStated position
Enact the Securities Clarity Act (H.R.2365) to amend the securities laws so that a digital token ('investment contract asset') is legally distinct from, and excluded from the definition of, the security it may have been sold as part of.
SourcesCryptopolitanCongress.gov (Library of Congress)· archivedcrypto.newsOffice of Congressman Tom Emmer· archivedView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Office context & community edit history
Help complete the record on this official
What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Tom Emmer more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.