RepublicanTom Emmer
U.S. Representative · Minnesota
Minnesota's 6th district
U.S. Representative from Minnesota
4 tracked promises
Running against
How they won their seat
Tom Emmer won the 2024 U.S. House election in Minnesota (District 6) with 62.4% of the vote (260,095 votes).
- Tom Emmer · Republican62.4%260,095
- Jeanne Hendricks · Democratic-Farmer-Labor37.4%155,836
- 1 Other Candidate0.1%565
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Tom Emmer's record indicates a pattern of activity in financial services, mental health, and regulatory issues, as evidenced by his sponsorship of bills such as the Securing Facilities for Mental Health Services Act and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. His committee membership on the House Committee on Financial Services is reflected in his involvement with financial technology and digital assets. Focus areas (from the record): Mental Health · Financial Services · Regulatory Reform · Blockchain Technology · Gun Rights Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against Emmer's legislative activity, which limits the ability to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal any stated goals or intentions; There is no information on the effectiveness of the sponsored bills; The absence of declared positions limits understanding of his overall policy priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Tom Emmer has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2023. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Tom Emmer has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score.
- Bills sponsored
- 7
Roll-call data last updated July 20, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$499K11%
- Large individual (itemized)$1.6M34%
- PAC / committee$2.5M55%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Financial ServicesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Vice Chairman, House Committee on Financial Services — Digital Assets, Financial Technology, and Artificial IntelligenceOn record since Jan 2025Chair
Source: Congress.gov.
Integrity
Not yet ratedNo promises have been rated yet, so there is no Integrity Score to show. Lifecycle promises (in progress, not yet rated) are tracked but never scored.
The score, once promises are rated, is a signed −100…+100 breakdown weighted by significance and evidence confidence — never a single opaque grade. How this is measured.
Integrity over time
Topic coverage
4 promises across 3 topicsWhat this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.
- Cryptocurrency Regulation2
- Election Integrity1
- Financial Privacy1
Evidence & significance
Evidence quality
Strongest source cited per promise.
- Primary (official record)4100%
Significance mix
How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).
Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.
4 tracked promises
“Pass the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act (H.R.1919) into law to permanently prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing, developing, testing, or implementing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) directly to individuals.”
“Enact the Securities Clarity Act (H.R.2365) to amend the securities laws so that a digital token ('investment contract asset') is legally distinct from, and excluded from the definition of, the security it may have been sold as part of.”
“Enact the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (H.R.3533) to ensure non-custodial blockchain developers and service providers -- miners, validators, and wallet providers who do not control customer funds -- are not classified or regulated as money transmitters.”
“Advance the Minnesota Voter Integrity Act of 2026 (H.R.7320), which would withhold federal Help America Vote Act election-assistance funds from Minnesota until the Secretary of State cooperates with the Department of Justice's review of the state's voter registration and voting practices.”
Verified record
123 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $8,309,786, spent $5,409,564, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 7156: SCAM Act ↗Jan 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7030: Securing Facilities for Mental Health Services Act ↗Jan 13, 2026
- Sponsored HR 4398: Veteran Burial Timeliness and Death Certificate Accountability Act ↗Jul 15, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3533: Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act ↗May 21, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3234: Keeping Deposits Local Act ↗May 7, 2025
- Sponsored HR 2365: Securities Clarity Act of 2025 ↗Mar 26, 2025
- Sponsored HR 2184: Firearm Due Process Protection Act of 2025 ↗Mar 18, 2025
- Sponsored HR 2183: CFPB Dual Mandate and Economic Analysis Act ↗Mar 18, 2025
- Sponsored HR 1919: Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act ↗Mar 6, 2025
- Sponsored HR 8066: Ammunition Supply Chain Act ↗Apr 18, 2024
- Sponsored HR 7873: Firearm Due Process Protection Act ↗Apr 5, 2024
- Sponsored HR 7455: Sunset Act of 2024 ↗Feb 26, 2024
Showing the 12 most recent of 123 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 609
- Yea
- 470
- Nay
- 130
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 9
Full voting record
609 votes- HR9237Nay
- HR5362Yea
- HR8595Yea
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Yea
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Yea
- HR8595Nay
- HR1181Yea
- HR1181Nay
- HR139Yea
- HRES1423Yea
- HRES1423Yea
- HR8897Yea
- HR3106Yea
- HRES1399Not voting
- HCONRES108Not voting
- HRES1398Not voting
- HRES1398Not voting
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Stated positions
3 positions on recordWhat this official says they believe — sourced claims, shown distinctly from tracked promises and from any assessment of what they did. A stated position is never scored and never affects the Integrity Score.
- Election IntegrityStated position
Advance the Minnesota Voter Integrity Act of 2026 (H.R.7320), which would withhold federal Help America Vote Act election-assistance funds from Minnesota until the Secretary of State cooperates with the Department of Justice's review of the state's voter registration and voting practices.
Sourceshttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/7320https://emmer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/emmer-cosponsors-minnesota-voter-integrity-act-of-2026-to-secure-minnesota-s-electionshttps://www.quiverquant.com/news/Press+Release:+Tom+Emmer+Cosponsors+Minnesota+Voter+Integrity+Act+of+2026View position & sources → - Financial PrivacyStated position
Pass the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act (H.R.1919) into law to permanently prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing, developing, testing, or implementing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) directly to individuals.
Sourceshttps://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2025201https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/119/hr1919https://riponadvance.com/featured/emmer-hill-kim-introduce-cbdc-anti-surveillance-state-act/https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1919https://emmer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/emmer-s-flagship-cbdc-anti-surveillance-state-act-passes-house-of-representativesView position & sources → - Cryptocurrency RegulationStated position
Enact the Securities Clarity Act (H.R.2365) to amend the securities laws so that a digital token ('investment contract asset') is legally distinct from, and excluded from the definition of, the security it may have been sold as part of.
Sourceshttps://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3533/texthttps://emmer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/emmer-s-securities-clarity-act-and-blockchain-regulatory-certainty-act-pass-house-financial-services-committee-markuphttps://crypto.news/tom-emmer-revives-blockchain-regulatory-certainty-act-that-protects-non-custodial-developers/https://www.cryptopolitan.com/tom-emmer-introduces-legislation/View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info
Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Help complete the record on this official
What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Tom Emmer more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.