Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
James Comer

RepublicanJames Comer

U.S. Representative · Kentucky

Kentucky's 1st district

RepublicanFederal

U.S. Representative from Kentucky

2 tracked promises, 2 rated

Kentucky · Kentucky's 1st district

Kentucky's 1st district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →
94/100
Trust rating
Strongly keeps promises
94
0 · Broken50 · Mixed100 · Kept
A transparent rescale of the Integrity Score (+88) to 0–100, aggregated from 2 rated promises. Never an opaque single score. Provisional — based on 2 rated promises they could act on; a settled rating needs at least 5.
How this is calculated →

How they won their seat

James Comer won the 2024 U.S. House election in Kentucky (District 1) with 74.7% of the vote (252,729 votes).

74.7%
Win share
252,729
Votes for winner
338,253
Total cast
  • James Comer · Republican74.7%
  • Erin Marshall · Democrat25.3%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

James Comer's record includes oversight, government reform, and business-related legislation. He has sponsored multiple bills aimed at preventing fraud, such as the 'Stopping Fraudulent Payments Act' and the 'Pre-Payment Fraud Prevention and Treasury Data Access Act', as well as legislation focused on local business support, exemplified by the 'Save Local Business Act'. Additionally, his role as Chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform involves responsibilities related to oversight and government reform. Focus areas (from the record): Oversight · Government Reform · Fraud Prevention · Business Support · Health Workforce Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against Comer's legislative activities, making it impossible to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal Comer's specific motives or intentions behind his legislative actions; There is no information on the effectiveness of the bills he has sponsored or their impact; The absence of declared positions limits the ability to assess his overall political philosophy or priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. James Comer has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Activity in office

What James Comer has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.

Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Monthly voting activity

  • Yea
  • Nay
  • Total
016324864VotesSep '25: 58 YeaSep '25: 6 NaySep '25Nov '25: 21 YeaNov '25: 2 NayNov '25Dec '25: 38 YeaDec '25: 19 NayDec '25Jan '26: 34 YeaJan '26: 13 NayJan '26Feb '26: 23 YeaFeb '26: 7 NayFeb '26Mar '26: 24 YeaMar '26: 6 NayMar '26Apr '26: 33 YeaApr '26: 12 NayApr '26May '26: 29 YeaMay '26: 7 NayMay '26Jun '26: 29 YeaJun '26: 13 NayJun '26Jul '26: 40 YeaJul '26: 9 NayJul '26Aug '26: 2 YeaAug '26: 0 NayAug '26Sep '26: 9 YeaSep '26: 1 NaySep '26Sep '25: 64 totalNov '25: 23 totalDec '25: 57 totalJan '26: 47 totalFeb '26: 30 totalMar '26: 30 totalApr '26: 47 totalMay '26: 36 totalJun '26: 42 totalJul '26: 50 totalAug '26: 2 totalSep '26: 10 total
Measures voted on:492 passed162 failed1 procedural/other

Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.

Vote attendance

97.7%
attendance
640 of 655 roll calls15 missed
Monthly participation rate
0255075100100%Sep 25Dec 25Feb 26Apr 26Jun 26Aug 26Sep 26

Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

46bills sponsored
1 became law2 passed a chamber23 pending20 awaiting status
035810Bills2017: 2 awaiting status220172018: 3 awaiting status320182019: 3 awaiting status320192020: 4 awaiting status420202021: 4 awaiting status420212022: 4 awaiting status420222023: 1 became law, 9 pending2023: 1 became law, 9 pending1020232024: 1 passed a chamber, 5 pending2024: 1 passed a chamber, 5 pending620242025: 1 passed a chamber, 5 pending2025: 1 passed a chamber, 5 pending620252026: 4 pending42026

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Independence

4%
Votes against own party
27 of 640 recent votes

How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.

Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bill success rate

4%
1 of 26 sponsored bills became law
1 became law2 passed a chamber23 pending

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$1.2M
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$500K$1M$1.5M$2M2026: raised $1.2M2026: spent $1.1M20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $30K (3%)Large individual (itemized): $686K (66%)66%PAC / committee: $329K (31%)31%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$30K3%
  • Large individual (itemized)$686K66%
  • PAC / committee$329K31%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Integrity

Promises kept vs. worked against — weighted breakdown

+88 · based on 2 rated promises

  • Championed 1
  • Fully Kept 1

Teal segments are promises kept; amber and stone segments are promises worked against. The signed score weights each rated promise by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is shown separately from popularity, finance, disclosure, and stated positions. Methodology is open.

Integrity over time

In office since Jan 2019 · 2 rated promises

The line steps at each recorded assessment and holds between them; it ends on the current published score.

−100 worked against0+100 kept
Integrity Score by assessment date. Score ranges from −100 (worked against) to +100 (kept).
DateIntegrity Score
Jul 202675
Jul 202688
Jan 202788 (current, held from last rating)

Promise status over time

How the tracked promise record has evolved.

2 tracked
  • Kept2
  • Against0
  • No opportunity0
  • In progress0
01122Jul 2026Jul 2026

Replayed from this official’s sourced assessment history — the bands step only when an assessment is recorded or changed. Based on the most recent roll-call votes on file and the tracked promise assessments; never interpolated.

Topic coverage

2 promises across 2 topics

What this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.

  • Agriculture1 promise
  • Government Oversight1 promise

Evidence & significance

Evidence quality

Strongest source cited per promise.

  • Primary (official record)2100%

Significance mix

How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).

10
20
30
40
52

Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.

Tracked promises

2 tracked promises

Fully Kepthigh confidence

Fully legalize industrial hemp at the federal level by removing it from the controlled-substances schedule, sponsoring the House Hemp Farming Act (H.R. 5485).

AgricultureSpecific · measurable
SourcesCongress.gov· archivedGovTrackWikipediaWikipediaWikipedia
Championedhigh confidence

As Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, investigate the Biden family's foreign business dealings and whether President Biden was compromised or swayed by foreign payments and influence.

Government OversightSpecific · measurable
SourcesWikipediaU.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformWikipediaWikipedia (citing The Washington Post)

Verified record

46 sponsored bills · finance on file

Facts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.

Campaign financeas of Apr 29, 2026

FEC 2026 cycle — raised $1,478,704, spent $1,588,677, cash on hand $0.

View the FEC filing ↗

Voting record

Total votes
655
Yea
520
Nay
120
Present
0
Not voting
15

Full voting record

655 votes
  • S32Yea
  • S307Yea
120 of 655
Page 1 / 33

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Positions on record

3 positions on record

The record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.

  • AgricultureStated position

    Fully legalize industrial hemp at the federal level by removing it from the controlled-substances schedule, sponsoring the House Hemp Farming Act (H.R. 5485).

    SourcesCongress.gov· archivedGovTrackWikipedia
    View position & sources
  • Government OversightStated position

    As Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, investigate the Biden family's foreign business dealings and whether President Biden was compromised or swayed by foreign payments and influence.

    SourcesU.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformWikipedia
    View position & sources
  • Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote

    On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.

    SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.
    View position & sources
Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Suggest a correction to this official's info

See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Office context & community edit history

Help complete the record on this official

What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks James Comer more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →