RepublicanJuan Ciscomani
U.S. Representative · Arizona
Arizona's 6th district
U.S. Representative from Arizona
2 tracked promises, 2 rated
How they won their seat
Juan Ciscomani won the 2024 U.S. House election in Arizona (District 6) with 50% of the vote (215,596 votes).
- Juan Ciscomani · Republican50%215,596
- Kirsten Engel · Democrat47.5%204,774
- Athena Eastwood · Green2.5%10,759
- 1 Other Candidate0%91
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Juan Ciscomani's record includes sponsorship of bills related to veterans' issues, housing, and national security, such as the AIR CARE for Vets Act of 2026 and the Veterans Economic Opportunity and Transition Administration Act of 2025. He is a member of committees that address veterans' affairs and appropriations related to national security and housing. Focus areas (from the record): Veterans Affairs · Housing · National Security · Economic Opportunity · Appropriations Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against Ciscomani's legislative activities and voting record. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal any declared positions or promises that could provide context for his legislative actions; There is no information on the effectiveness of the bills he sponsored; Motive or intent behind his legislative actions cannot be inferred from the available data. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Juan Ciscomani has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2025–2027 term. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Juan Ciscomani has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$501K13%
- Large individual (itemized)$1.8M46%
- PAC / committee$1.7M42%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on AppropriationsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Veterans' AffairsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related AgenciesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Veterans' Affairs — Oversight and InvestigationsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — National Security, Department of State, and Related ProgramsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Vice Chair, House Committee on Appropriations — Homeland SecurityOn record since Jan 2025Chair
- Member, House Committee on Veterans' Affairs — Economic OpportunityOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Integrity
Promises kept vs. worked against — weighted breakdown+70 · based on 2 rated promises
- Attempted 1
- Fully Kept 1
Teal segments are promises kept; amber and stone segments are promises worked against. The signed score weights each rated promise by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is shown separately from popularity, finance, disclosure, and stated positions. Methodology is open.
Integrity over time
In office since Jan 2023 · 2 rated promisesThe line steps at each recorded assessment and holds between them; it ends on the current published score.
| Date | Integrity Score |
|---|---|
| Sep 2026 | 100 |
| Sep 2026 | 70 |
| Jan 2027 | 70 (current, held from last rating) |
Promise status over time
How the tracked promise record has evolved.
- Kept2
- Against0
- No opportunity0
- In progress0
Replayed from this official’s sourced assessment history — the bands step only when an assessment is recorded or changed. Based on the most recent roll-call votes on file and the tracked promise assessments; never interpolated.
Topic coverage
2 promises across 2 topicsWhat this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.
- government reform1 promise
- taxes1 promise
Evidence & significance
Evidence quality
Strongest source cited per promise.
- Primary (official record)2100%
Significance mix
How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).
Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.
2 tracked promises
“Signed the Americans for Tax Reform Taxpayer Protection Pledge, committing to oppose any and all efforts to increase income tax rates on individuals or businesses and to oppose any net reduction or elimination of tax deductions and credits unless matched dollar-for-dollar by rate cuts.”
“Signed the U.S. Term Limits pledge, committing as a member of Congress to cosponsor and vote for the U.S. Term Limits constitutional amendment limiting U.S. Representatives to three terms and U.S. Senators to two terms.”
Verified record
63 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $5,083,547, spent $1,488,377, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9666: AIR CARE for Vets Act of 2026 ↗Jul 14, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8171: FAST Housing Act ↗Apr 2, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8043: Vets CLEAR Act ↗Mar 24, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8029: Pay Our Homeland Defenders Act ↗Mar 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7978: Cooperative Watershed Management Program Reauthorization Act of 2026 ↗Mar 18, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1016: Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a correction in the engrossment of H.R. 7147. ↗Jan 22, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7086: Equitable Access to School Facilities Act ↗Jan 15, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6843: Establishing the Veterans Economic Opportunity and Transition Administration Act of 2025 ↗Dec 18, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6379: Shadow Wolves Improvement Act ↗Dec 3, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6380: Chiricahua National Park Act ↗Dec 3, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6247: To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 13355 North Lon Adams Road in Marana, Arizona, as the Mayor Ed Honea Memorial Post Office. ↗Nov 21, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5709: TAAP Act ↗Oct 8, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 474
- Nay
- 144
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 37
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Not voting
- HR1501Yea
- HJRES1Yea
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HRES1490Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Yea
- HCONRES89Nay
- HCONRES113Yea
- HR7008Yea
- HR7008Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
3 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources → - government reformStated position
Signed the U.S. Term Limits pledge, committing as a member of Congress to cosponsor and vote for the U.S. Term Limits constitutional amendment limiting U.S. Representatives to three terms and U.S. Senators to two terms.
SourcesU.S. Term Limits· archivedBallotpediaView position & sources → - taxesStated position
Signed the Americans for Tax Reform Taxpayer Protection Pledge, committing to oppose any and all efforts to increase income tax rates on individuals or businesses and to oppose any net reduction or elimination of tax deductions and credits unless matched dollar-for-dollar by rate cuts.
SourcesAmericans for Tax ReformBallotpediaView position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Office context & community edit history
Help complete the record on this official
What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Juan Ciscomani more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.