DemocratMarie Gluesenkamp Perez
U.S. Representative · Washington
Washington's 3rd district
U.S. Representative from Washington
3 tracked promises, 3 rated
How they won their seat
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez won the 2024 U.S. House election in Washington (District 3) with 51.7% of the vote (215,177 votes).
- Marie Gluesenkamp Perez · Democrat51.7%215,177
- Joe Kent · Republican47.9%199,054
- 1 Other Candidate0.4%1,673
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez's record includes legislation related to rural development, public safety, and support for local businesses. Examples of her sponsored bills are the 'FARM Act' and 'Expanding Childcare in Rural America Act of 2025', which relate to agricultural and childcare issues. Additionally, her committee memberships on Appropriations are noted. Focus areas (from the record): Rural Development · Public Safety · Childcare · Local Business Support · Environmental Protection Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against her legislative activity, making it difficult to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal any declared positions or promises that could provide context for her legislative focus; There is no information on the effectiveness of the bills she sponsored or her overall impact in office; The record does not indicate her engagement with constituents or community feedback. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2025–2027 term. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Marie Gluesenkamp Perez has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$279K8%
- Large individual (itemized)$2.3M66%
- PAC / committee$862K25%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on AppropriationsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related AgenciesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — Financial Services and General GovernmentOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Integrity
Promises kept vs. worked against — weighted breakdown+58 · based on 3 rated promises
- Attempted 1
- Championed 2
Teal segments are promises kept; amber and stone segments are promises worked against. The signed score weights each rated promise by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is shown separately from popularity, finance, disclosure, and stated positions. Methodology is open.
Integrity over time
In office since Jan 2023 · 3 rated promisesThe line steps at each recorded assessment and holds between them; it ends on the current published score.
| Date | Integrity Score |
|---|---|
| Sep 2026 | 75 |
| Sep 2026 | 50 |
| Sep 2026 | 58 |
| Jan 2027 | 58 (current, held from last rating) |
Promise status over time
How the tracked promise record has evolved.
- Kept3
- Against0
- No opportunity0
- In progress0
Replayed from this official’s sourced assessment history — the bands step only when an assessment is recorded or changed. Based on the most recent roll-call votes on file and the tracked promise assessments; never interpolated.
Topic coverage
3 promises across 3 topicsWhat this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.
- Infrastructure1
- Reproductive Rights1
- Right to Repair1
Evidence & significance
Evidence quality
Strongest source cited per promise.
- Primary (official record)3100%
Significance mix
How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).
Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.
3 tracked promises
“Secure the federal funding needed to replace the century-old I-5 Interstate Bridge over the Columbia River, and work to reduce and limit tolls on the replacement.”
“Vote against any national abortion ban and support a federal law guaranteeing abortion access nationwide.”
“Champion and pass right-to-repair legislation so consumers and farmers can fix their own vehicles and equipment rather than being forced to use the original manufacturer — she introduced the REPAIR Act (with Rep. Neal Dunn) and the SMART Act (with Rep. Darrell Issa).”
Verified record
57 sponsored billsFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9637: Protecting Columbia River Salmon Act of 2026 ↗Jul 9, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8828: To direct the Attorney General to establish an official station for the United States attorney for the Western District of Washington in the county of Clark, Washington, and for other purposes. ↗May 14, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8799: Stop Scamming Truckers Act ↗May 13, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1161: Congressional Quilt Show Resolution of 2026 ↗Apr 9, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8184: Fair Prices for Local Businesses Act ↗Apr 2, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1104: Directing the Office of Congressional Conduct to establish standards of conduct related to mental capacity of members of the House of Representatives. ↗Mar 4, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7772: LIGHT Safety Act ↗Mar 3, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 878: Disapproving the behavior of Representative Jesús G. Chuy García of Illinois. ↗Nov 17, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5857: FARM Act ↗Oct 28, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5363: Expanding Childcare in Rural America Act of 2025 ↗Sep 15, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5155: Warrior Right to Repair Act of 2025 ↗Sep 4, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4575: Jobs in the Woods Act ↗Jul 21, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 398
- Nay
- 249
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 8
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Yea
- HR1501Yea
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HRES1490Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Yea
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
3 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Reproductive RightsStated position
Vote against any national abortion ban and support a federal law guaranteeing abortion access nationwide.
SourcesClark County TodayMarie for Congress (campaign)Reed MagazineWikipediaView position & sources → - Right to RepairStated position
Champion and pass right-to-repair legislation so consumers and farmers can fix their own vehicles and equipment rather than being forced to use the original manufacturer — she introduced the REPAIR Act (with Rep. Neal Dunn) and the SMART Act (with Rep. Darrell Issa).
SourcesClark County TodayReed MagazineThe Spokesman-ReviewWikipediaMarie for Congress (campaign)View position & sources → - InfrastructureStated position
Secure the federal funding needed to replace the century-old I-5 Interstate Bridge over the Columbia River, and work to reduce and limit tolls on the replacement.
SourcesWikipediaMarie for Congress (campaign)Clark County TodayThe ColumbianView position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Office context & community edit history
Help complete the record on this official
What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Marie Gluesenkamp Perez more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.